My coverage of the Pussy Church for Modern Witchcraft provoked some strong reactions. Not surprisingly, they mostly had nothing to do with why I was discussing the organization on a tax blog. They were mainly about my brief introductory explanation of the context of the ongoing conflict that it appears Pussy Church is addressing.
@peterreillycpa you'd really benefit from reading some radical feminist literature but I think if you managed to send out a round of inquiries for statements about a pussy church without realizing YOU DIDN'T ASK ANY WOMEN, you just may be too far gone đ
So I hesitate to mention this, since it might make me looking even lamer but I have been reading radical feminist literature for over six years. Included in the piece was a link to the most recent book I had read (Mostly. It was a collection and some of the pieces I did not get well enough to finish. Others were great.).
And as it happens, accepting even the radfem definition of woman, I had asked a woman. She just preferred not to be identified. And for the purposes of that particular piece I was only interested in what someone involved in Pussy Church had to say about what Pussy Church was about, not what other gender critical feminists might infer what it was about.
Regardless kthln m°y inspired the project that this post on a blog with a smaller readership and looser editorial guidelines is a report on it. I put out in a couple of ways the following question:
If someone just discovered the dispute between gender critical radical feminists and advocates for the trans community. What is the very first thing he or she should read to begin getting educated? Asking for a friend.
Here are the results SO FAR in the order that I have received them. I will indicate whether I have read them in full or not (listened to a recording counts) and rate them on how well I think somebody new to the issue would understand them and general relevance. Rating is 1 to 10. 10 being - I think somebody with no background in the matter would understand this piece and it is relevant. 5 being - relevant understandable material but probably not where to start. 1 - What were you thinking when you suggested this as relevant entry level material?
The rating has nothing to do with whether I agree with the piece or not. Also I might rate a piece I think is quite good lower because I think someone fresh might have a problem understanding it. For example if "cis" is included without being defined or Sheila Jeffreys is mentioned in a way that implies she is a household name, points are lost. Also pieces that only explain a particular aspect of the controversy without giving the overall context lose points. I have rated a couple of things I did not finish, but I dug far enough to get a good sense of their content.
One of the advantages of this venue is that comments are allowed. I apologize in advance to anyone who sent me something that I failed to include here and will fix it asap.
Pieces I Have Found On My Own (With some curation)
What I believe about sex and gender (and what I don't) by Kathleen Stock - Read in full - 11
I've decided that regardless of how many pieces are on the list there will only be one that is an eleven. In this piece Kathleen Stock identifies many of the elements in the debate rather thoughtfully.
Sheila Jeffreys - Wikipedia entry - 8
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
With some exceptions most pieces will at least implicitly include something like:
The science is settled. Any far minded person who has the true facts and is not blinded by the propaganda put out by the -------------------- will agree with us.
If the piece does not also implicitly include
The arguments put forth by ----------------- and their allies are so ridiculous and hateful that they don't bear repeating
I still might give it a high score
The key factor though is the assumption that the reader is starting from zero. And of course a piece like that might be rated very low for other purposes.
Remember what I am looking for is something that allows someone to grasp that there is a controversy and how it can be framed. Earlier this year I attempted this sort of thing with a pretty arcane topic that has some general interest - The Tax Cuts And Jobs Act - Here it is.
An advantage of this site is that it allows comments. I really don't have any restrictions more of an aspirational standard which I explained when we had comments on forbes.com. Some people can probably come up with something nasty enough to merit deletion. We'll see.
What I would most appreciate is additions to the list. As I noted above if something somebody sent me is left off, it was by accident and easy to fix.
Peter J Reilly writes on taxes for forbes.com. Almost anything you can think of will have a tax angle eventually, so he sometimes find himself in unrelated arguments.
So this will be a longish introduction to a really long piece. I will start with the disclaimer that the views expressed by Johnny Cirucci (below the dotted line) are not the views of Peter J Reilly or Your Tax Matters Partner. There is stuff down there I agree with, but most of it I see as batshit crazy and some of it as arguably hateful. And I am growing very fond of Johnny Cirucci, because it is possible in the alt-right conspiracy bubble, which the woes of Kent Hovind introduced me to, Johnny is sui generis. Possibly somewhat exaggerating his underlying views, it seems like he think he and three or four other guys actually get it and the rest of them are either dupes or controlled opposition, a few of whom have been "read in" and are getting the bennies. The tax protest movement always kind of mystified me, because their legal arguments were so lame and they always lost in court (except in a few willfulness cases, where people convinced a jury they were too stupid to understand they were breaking the tax law, thereby avoiding criminal, but not civil, liability). I finally realized that their arguments implied a large conspiracy involving pretty much everybody involved in the federal government except for maybe a couple of park rangers and the leadership of the E-4 mafia. And observing the Hovindicators I noted that they chomped on conspiracy theories like they were Lays Potato Chips. Oddly a few of them seemed kind of quaint as when God's Property Radio called me a Jesuit and Rudy Davis talked about how they operate in the open unlike the Jesuits. I really like Rudy Davis and I know him well enough to feel comfortable that when I say that he is a redneck, he will take it as a compliment. Ernie Land, Kent Hovinds consigliere, also has some redneck sensibilities as does Dominating Deborah who recently posted here. Kent Hovind, himself, is kind of a redneck wanabee.
There is a special fondness between rednecks and white urban ethnics memorialized in the bromance between Montgomery Clift and Frank Sinatra in From Here To Eternity.
But we are different tribes. Johnny Cirucci and me, that is something different. Even though I am 100% Irish descent, I am kind of Italian by association from growing up in Fairview NJ. And Johnny is a Jersey boy. When rednecks talk about Jesuits and the Pope, it is kind of amusing. If they ever heard of transubstantiation, they think it has something to do with auto repair. Johnny has the background and education though. And Johnny buys conspiracy theories by the bushel, Nonetheless, he has an overarching theory that makes it all fit together. It is the Vatican that is pulling the strings and at least for the last 500 years it is the Jesuits that you will find lurking in every corner. Just for an example. Take Donald Trump. Wharton graduate right? Yes, but two years at Fordham University starting out. And of course your typical redneck thinks that Fordham is dinner at the diner next to the dealership and can't see the Jesuit connection so obvious to a Jersey boy. At any rate, I asked Johnny to write about Kent Hovind and he gave me a lot more than I asked for. I think his biggest weakness as a writer is that he spends too much time on tangential support for his positions, but de gustibus non est disputandum. Oddly enough Johnny and I have a pretty consistent evaluation of Kent Hovind, but you will have to skip down quite a bit to get to his take on Hovind. It is worth reading the whole thing, but try not to get to bewildered and don't even attempt to go down all the rabbit holes. Johnny's technique might be compared to the Gish Gallop, although I am sure he looks at it differently. Any way, here you go. - PJR -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- How “Stormy Daniels” and Kent Hovind brought a conspiracy
theorist and Forbes CPA together.
by Johnny Cirucci
Pay your taxes!
If you’re a Johnny Cirucci fan (one of his “flying
monkeys”), I’ll bet you were surprised to see him write that.
If you’re a Peter J. Reilly fan, I’ll bet you’re asking,
“Who the heck is ‘Johnny Cirucci’?!”
About Johnny Cirucci
I ran across Peter about three years ago.I had just published my first book,IlluminatiUnmasked, and had begun doing interviews.
Invariably, the subject of Kent Hovind would come up.
Kent was slated for possible release from prison but the
hearing didn’t look hopeful.He was a
hot topic for “alternative” Christian media at the time.
As a Jesuit-educated writer for Forbes, I considered Peter
one of “them” and avoided corresponding with him.
But Peter is an interesting guy.While I tend to be an excitable Italian and
former Catholic, he remains an unflappable Irishman and, he assures me, a former
Catholic.He recently
related his first experience in a Protestant Church to the current troubles
the Trump Foundation is having paying taxes in the state of New York.
It wouldn’t be the first time a wily Jesuit had gone
undercover!
Although I write that tongue-in-cheek, I firmly believe that
such was the case for a host of prominent people from the Jesuit-educated
critic of Christianity, François-Marie “Voltaire” Arouet to the “former” late
Jesuit priest Malachi Martin.
The Jesuits are the ultimate order in service to the Papacy
and it’s a tough sell to present the idea that a Catholic priest wants to
serve...but not that much.
Martin’s book, The
Jesuits, sits well-highlited and noted upon my shelf.My summary would be, “The Jesuits used
to be a great bunch of guys but then they turned a bad corner and went
Communist.”
By the way, that’s not hyperbole.
Though the movement has been global
since its inception, it was above all in Latin America that the strange
alliance between Jesuits and Marxists gathered its first practical momentum.It was there that this new Jesuit mission,
entailing as it does nothing less than the transformation of the sociopolitical
face of the West, first entangled lives far more profoundly than McGovern and
theoreticians like him anticipated.Quickly,
scores of Jesuits began to work with the passion and zeal that has always been
so typical of them, for the success of the Sandinocommunists in Nicaragua; and,
when the Sandinistas took power, those same Jesuits entered crucial posts in
the central government, and attracted others to join at various regional levels.In other Central American countries,
meanwhile, Jesuits not only participated in guerrilla training of Marxist
cadres, but some became guerrilla fighters themselves.Inspired by the idealism they saw in
Liberation Theology, and encouraged by the independence inherent in the new
idea of the Church as a group of autonomous communities, Jesuits found that all
was permitted-even encouraged-as long as it furthered the concept of the new
“people’s Church.”
Such men were the dream and ideal
of the true Liberation Theologians.For
they were the fighters, the cadres who took Liberation Theology from theory to
what they called praxis-the implementation of the people’s revolution
for economic and political liberation.From
that praxis, the Liberation Theologians insisted, from “below among the
people,” would come all true theology to replace the old theology once imposed
autocratically “from above” by the hierarchy of the Roman Church. ~ The
Jesuits, Malachi Martin, Simon & Schuster (1987), pp. 17-18
Apparently, the Jesuits haven’t returned from their hard
Left turn.Another “ex-Jesuit”, Greg
Galluzzo, trained Barack Obama in Chicago “community organizing”.
The Catholic periodical “Our
Sunday Visitor” lists Chicago one of the “Top 10 Catholic Communities” and
even takes note of its ... “ethnic diversity” (code for racial unrest
generously encouraged by Rome).
Chicago’s Catholic heart is based
in its ethnic diversity.
As the Windy City became
industrialized in the mid-19th century, immigrants from Southern and Eastern
Europe flocked to Chicago — joining the already present Irish and Germans — to
become part of its workforce. Ethnic communities naturally formed, and ethnic
Catholic parishes naturally followed. Today, more than 350 Catholic churches
remain, many built in impressive European style.
It has
been rumored that, once a Jesuit proves themselves truly dedicated to Rome,
they are invited to take a “Blood Oath” in which they swear to have no will of
their own, “perinde ac cadaver”, to be as a dead man in the strictest
obedience to the Pope.
This “Fourth Vow” is said to have sold Alessandro Farnese8—Pope
Paul III—on consecrating the new order for Spanish nobleman Ignacio LĂłpez
(later known as Ignatius of Loyola).
After a serious injury in the military
and during a lengthy rehabilitation, Ignatius Loyola (b. 1491, d. 1556) turned his
focus from “military enthusiasm to ghostly fanaticism.(2)Ignatius assumed the name and office of Knight of the Virgin Mary,
seeing himself as Mary’s favorite.Ignatius wanted to start a new order, The Society of Jesus (or the Jesuits)
and presented the idea to the Pope.He told
the Pope that the idea had been inspired by heavenly revelations.At first, the Pope hesitated, but when Ignatius added a fourth vow (in
addition to the regular poverty, chastity, and obedience), “absolute
subservience to the pope,” promising to do whatever the Pope wanted and go
wherever he wanted, the Pope agreed and sent the new order out to “invade the
world.”While other monks of other
orders sought to separate themselves from the world, the Jesuits went out into the
world and obeyed whatever command the Pope gave.Often this was to win the world with the sword.No violent act was withheld if the order came
from their top “general.”(3) ~ The Jesuit Agenda
and the Evangelical/Protestant Church, Roger Oakland,
Understand the Times/Lighthouse Trails Special Report
But now, a Jesuit is the Pope.—And it raised more than one eyebrow to see
that the vacancy provided for Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio was the
resignation of Pope Benedict; an event that had not occurred in
the previous 600 years.It wouldn’t
be the first time the Jesuits were accused of mafioso skullduggery.
Bergoglio, himself, has a murky past, hidden behind
Argentina’s “Dirty War”.A series of
corrupt military dictatorships purged Argentina of their political enemies
under the guise of “anti-Communism”.
Many of the victims were held for
months in official institutions, where they were repeatedly tortured before
being killed, their bodies “disappeared.” Justifying the purge, which was spoken about
euphemistically but carried out in secrecy, the Argentine military espoused a
brand of anti-Communist ferocity that echoed Franco’s Fascist witch hunt, which
had previously devastated Republican Spain — a brand of ferocity that also
shared his deeply entrenched ultra-Catholic and anti-Semitic views. ~ The
New Yorker
It’s hard to imagine worse than Inquisition torture but
Franco managed it: child trafficking.
For Whom The Bell Tolls
In Spain, hundreds of thousands of
babies were stolen from their parents and trafficked by the Fascist government
of Francisco Franco via the Catholic Church.
Up to 300,000 Spanish babies
were stolen from their parents and sold for adoption over a period of five
decades, a new investigation reveals.
The children were trafficked by
a secret network of doctors, nurses, priests and nuns in a widespread practice
that began during General Franco’s dictatorship and continued until the early
Nineties. ...
Several mothers say they were
told their first-born children had died during or soon after they gave birth.
...
But the women, often young and
unmarried, were told they could not see the body of the infant or attend their
burial.
In reality, the babies were
sold...
Official documents were forged
so the adoptive parents’ names were on the infants’ birth certificates. ...
Journalist Katya Adler, who has
investigated the scandal, says: “The situation is incredibly sad for thousands
of people.”
“There are men and women across
Spain whose lives have been turned upside-down by discovering the people they
thought were their parents actually bought them for cash. There are also many mothers who have
maintained for years that their babies did not die – and were labelled
‘hysterical’ – but are now discovering that their child has probably been alive
and brought up by somebody else all this time.”
Experts believe the cases may
account for up to 15 per cent of the total adoptions that took place in Spain between
1960 and 1989.
It began as a system for taking
children away from families deemed politically dangerous to the regime of
General Franco, which began in 1939. The
system continued after the dictator’s death in 1975 as the Catholic church
continued to retain a powerful influence on public life, particularly in social
services. ~ Daily Mail83
What made the scheme easy to
accomplish was that the Catholic Church ran schools, orphanages and hospitals,
and still does (even in “Protestant” countries like America).
In Fascist Spain, however, the
power of the Catholic Church was as blatant and all-encompassing as it is in
Ireland.
On April 1, 1939, GeneralĂsimo
Francisco Franco, crusading leader of the rebellious Nationalist forces,
triumphantly declared the Spanish Civil War over. The Catholic Church was the institution that
most benefitted from Franco’s victory. Its hierarchy had blessed the
Nationalist uprising as a crusade and had justified the war to the world as an
“armed plebiscite.” Now it reaped
the reward. Franco quickly abolished all
those Republican** measures that had undermined the Church’s spiritual and
social roles, and entrusted it with more power and privilege than it had
enjoyed since the 18th century.
For the Church, the privileges
constituted a spiritual “reconquista” complementing the political “reconquista”
enjoyed by Franco and his Nationalists. What
the political “reconquista” meant was the return to Castilian centralism and
the elimination of other ideologies. The
“reconquista” for the Church signified Catholic monopoly over the life of all
Spaniards, a vital privilege if society was to be “re-Catholicised”. This “re-Catholicisation” was not an easy
undertaking keeping in mind that, in supporting the Nationalists during the
War, the Church had alienated a large percentage of the population. ...
For Cardinal GomĂĄ, primate of
Spain, the only way was to impose “divine totalitarianism”, i.e. the
imposition of Catholic values on all Spanish society. Franco was only too glad
to help.
The privileged status of the
Church was granted immediately following the Civil War. A little later —in June
1941— its rights were outlined in an Agreement between the Vatican and the
Franco government, and finally formalised in a Concordat signed in August,
1953. Amongst the provisions were:
1. recognition of Catholicism
as the official religion of the country;
2. Mandatory religious instruction at all educational levels in conformity with
Catholic dogma;
3. Financial support of the church by the state (paying the salary of priests
and contributing to the (re)construction of church buildings);
4. Guaranteed representation in both press and radio.
~ Spain Then And Now84
The fact that the government of
Spain, in collusion with the Catholic Church, were the institutions that
kidnapped babies meant that it is impossible to account for them all. Despite media white-washing, it is a foregone
conclusion that many of the children weren’t simply “sold” to good Catholics
who wanted them, they were trafficked, tortured and ritually slaughtered.
Proof is found in how Rome
maintained these crimes against the Spanish people long after Franco’s death.
GeneralĂsimo Francisco Franco was personally
assisted by Father Josemaria Escriva, the founder of Opus Dei.85
It would not be the last time Opus
Dei was the vehicle by which children were trafficked, abused and murdered. ~ Eaters
of Children, Giovanni Augustino Cirucci, CreateSpace (September 11th,
2017), pp. 74-76
The same
outrages occurred during the Argentinian Dirty War.However, no institution of repute is daring
to link Cardinal Bergoglio (now Pope Francis I) directly to child trafficking.
Below mainstream media, former Church of Canada
Priest-turned-human-rights activist Kevin Annett does level the accusation.
A former civil servant in the
Argentine military junta who is living in exile in Spain claims that Pope
Francis engineered the kidnapping and trafficking of children of political
prisoners during the Dirty War of the 1970’s.
The man bases his claim on his
personal involvement in meetings between Bergoglio and senior junta members
that secured the child trafficking networks using Catholic orphanages and
religious bodies as covers.
A Spanish reporter who has
interviewed the former civil servant states,
“This guy is genuine and has many
names and dates, and notes from meetings. Apparently, Bergoglio was promised
the top spot in the Argentine church if he cooperated with the junta. So it’s
small wonder that as the Pope, he’s made it harder for honest catholics to
report child abuse, considering his own complicity.” ~ ITCCS.org
Unfortunately, Annett and his “International Tribunal into
Crimes of Church and State” harm their credibility with delusions of grandeur;
frequently proclaiming that an “international court in Brussels” has convicted Bergoglio of child trafficking.
That was 2014.
Exactly what law enforcement agency is going to be doing the
arresting, Annett doesn’t say.In fact,
Bergoglio has never been arrested for child trafficking and, if a “trial”
ever took place he was tried in absentia.
Argentina’s “Dirty War” was supposedly an “ultra-Right”
purge of “Communists”, yet Pope Francis I maintains a posture that is nothing
less than far-Left.3
From “global warming” to gun control, Papa Francisco
seems to have gone to the “opposite extreme” of his Communist-hunting
Cardinalcy.
“Please
do not be ashamed of your traditions,” he told the audience. “Do not forget the lessons you learned from
your elders, which are something you can bring to enrich the life of this
American land. I repeat, do not be
ashamed of what is part of you, your lifeblood. You are called to be responsible citizens and
to contribute, like others who with so much strength did before you . . . fruitfully
to the life of the communities in which you live.”
Francis
also culled American history to underscore his remarks about the treatment of
immigrants.
“We
remember the great struggles which led to the abolition of slavery, the
extension of voting rights, the growth of the labor movement, and the gradual
effort to eliminate every kind of racism and prejudice against the earlier arrival
of new Americans,” he said.
In an era of deadly terrorism and weapons of mass
destruction, decades of wide-open borders are nothing less than treason.
Although “mainstream media” decries any attempt to close the
borders as “racist”, the issue isn’t “race” as much as “religion”.
As in America’s past, the vast majority of immigrants
pouring across those open borders are Roman Catholic.
However, in stark contrast to waves of Catholic immigrants
of yester-year, simply walking across an open border means you don’t have to
assimilate.
Consequently, ghettos of Spanish-speaking illegal immigrants
are common to every state in the Union.This exacerbates the refusal of U.S. officials at all levels of
government to enforce immigration laws and causes natural-born citizens (at
least those whose parents didn’t consider labor pains as synonymous with a
starting gun) to react in anger at said Spanish-speakers.
The situation is worsened when, not only Federal, State and
local governments provide Spanish-speaking service to illegal immigrants but
most businesses do, as well.
One would think that encouraging “immigrants” to wear their
background on their sleeves—and then reiterating the encouragement—makes a bad
situation even worse.
Although the Jesuits have oft been accused of masterfully
manipulating civic discontent to steer in their favor, surely Pope Francis
knows not what he does.
As Trump’s Conservative constituency begins to get
impatient, they are encouraged to be satisfied with real progress such
as Attorney General and former ensconced 20-year United States Senator
Jeff Sessions telling Justice Department bureaucrats to be
sure and say “illegal alien” whenever speaking of “undocumented visitors”.
Top Jesuits are even managing to upset Conservative
Catholics.
His counterpart in the Order, Superior General Arturo Sosa
(known as the “Black Pope”2) has backed up the Jesuit disappearing
of eternal damnation by telling the Spanish newspaper El Mundo that Satan
is just a man-made “symbol”.
In relation to the words of Jesus Christ recorded in Mark
10:9 on the sanctity of marriage — “What God has joined, let no man separate,”
— Sosa
told Swiss journalist Giuseppe Rusconi that no one used a “tape recorder”
to chronicle the words of Jesus and, therefore, they should be examined “in
context”.
What does all this have to do with Peter J. Reilly, Kent
Hovind and paying your taxes?—Nothing.It was just my
introduction.
And Now For Something Completely Different
I’ve come a long way since 2015.
Somehow, Peter and I were connected on Twitter—I think he
reached out and I was at a point where curiosity about “the other team” was
overcoming my trepidation so I returned the “follow”.
That put Peter on my feed and when I saw him “like” a
“tweet” from an unexpected source, I had to jump into the fray.
Her real name is Stephanie Gregory5 Clifford, but
that’s not what the media calls her.She’s a pornography “actress” and the media not only plastered her and
her breasts all over the airwaves (which was wonderful for your children to
see) but they were always sure to use her porn name, “Stormy Daniels”.
Supposedly, “Stormy” had
sex with your president just after his third wife had their latest child,
“Barron”.7
The media has used this literal harlot to make pornography a
household item for the youngest of children.Who would think to put a parental
block on the 5 o’clock news?
This actually could have been the ultimate motive the entire
time; so much so that it’s quite possible Donald Trump never even met Stephanie
Clifford.9
I find it particularly ironic that Vatican sources like the
Catholic News Service seem to be on the forefront of this revelation.
The percentage of Americans who say
pornography is morally acceptable increased more over the past year than in all
other years this decade combined.
While the acceptability of porn
still holds minority status in the United States, it has climbed to 43 percent,
according to Gallup Poll figures released June 5. The number increased by 7 percent from last
year’s figure.
In 2011, when Gallup first started
asking this question, only 30 percent said pornography was morally acceptable. As of last year, that figure had climbed to 36
percent, a rise of 6 percent.
While acceptance of pornography had
trailed other social issues earlier this decade, such as doctor-assisted
suicide, same-sex relations, sex between unmarried people and out-of-wedlock
childbirth, the 2017-18 surge means that porn has eclipsed all other social
issues in their growing acceptance by Americans this decade, according to Gallup.
A report on the poll’s findings by
Gallup analyst Andrew Dugan said that while Americans had grown more tolerant
on social norms over the decade, the reason behind the steep climb on
pornography is “less clear.”
One theory Dugan offered is that
adult film actress Stormy Daniels, a “fierce critic of President Donald Trump,
has given pornography a sense of moral credibility that it previously lacked.”
~ Crux
Now
Does this just happen to be “one theory” or does the
Catholic News Service have an insider source?
Unfortunately, Donald Trump is far from being unfairly
wounded here.In fact, another aspect of
this contrived “scandal” is damage control.Trump’s secrets are actually more dark and perverse than a “fling with a
porn actress”.That’s how he was
selected to be “elected”: he’s a slave to the blackmail of his deviant past.
In comparison to what Donald Trump really is, the
“Stormy Daniels” scandal is tame, even appealing to some with looser morals.It’s a well-used tactic.
Hillary Rodham continued to play the
role of strong-man by illegally
going through the FBI dossiers of their political enemies for blackmail.Neither the existence of the dossiers nor the
activity were addressed with prosecution.
In fact, the corruptions that occurred
during the Clinton Administration that were being ignored were so vast a side-show
was fabricated over a sexual tryst Bill had in the Oral Office.Meanwhile, in best Hegelian fashion, Bill’s Jesuit
keepers were ordering him to keep backwards Communist China in full threat status
by sending them nuclear
secrets and supercomputers;
all acts of high treason that were shoved under Monica Lewinsky’s stained dress.
~ Can
We Finally Call Hillary A Roman? Johnny Cirucci, JohnnyCirucci.com,
25 July 2016
If Trump hasn’t met Stephanie Clifford (or maybe she’s one
of many such harlots he’s bought), why did his handlers choose her for the
spotlight?She has greatly benefited
from the show.
Her recent arrest and release may give some insight.
Charges against adult film actress
Stormy Daniels for allegedly touching three undercover detectives while
performing at an Ohio strip club were dismissed Thursday, her attorney said.
Daniels,who gained
notoriety after suing President Donald Trump following an alleged affair, had
faced three misdemeanor counts of illegally touching a patron, court records
show.
Daniels, whose legal name is
Stephanie Clifford, posted a $6,054 bail and was released Thursday morning, and
was due to be arraigned Friday, records show.
Because Daniels does not regularly
appear at the club, the charges were dismissed, according to court documents.
“I’ve determined that these crimes
were not committed, based on the fact that Ms. Clifford has not made regular
appearances at this establishment as required under the law,” Columbus City
Attorney Zach Klein said in a statement after reviewing the case.
Daniels had planned to plead not
guilty to the three misdemeanor charges, her attorney, Michael Avenatti, tweeted.
The arrest of Daniels and two
others was part of a “long-term investigation into allegations of human
trafficking, prostitution, & other vice related violations,” Columbus
police said in a statement. ~ CNN
Not only was Clifford (whom CNN prefers to call by her porn
name) released, but she admitted that two other strippers who were arrested
with her were not.
Maybe she just had a better lawyer.
Michael John Avenatti has an education very similar
to Donald Trump, having first received Catholic instruction at the
public-sounding Saint Louis University before transferring 900 miles east to
the University of Pennsylvania to be given a more overtly
“public” degree.
Perhaps the clue can be found in the arrest being the result
of a “long-term investigation into allegations of human trafficking...”As I’ve already
shown you conclusively, real power is sealed through the abuse of
children.That includes the power to
avoid prosecution (which seems to be the case for virtually every high-profile
pedophile I’ve researched).
According to Ken Wooden, a child
safety expert who has interviewed more than 1,000 sex offenders and abductors,
the biggest mistake parents make is to think it’s enough to tell children,
“Don’t talk to strangers.”
“In the eyes of a kid, a stranger
is some character who’s very scary and a monster type,” said Wooden.In reality, though, molesters can look like
ordinary, friendly, engaging adults, Wooden warned. ~ ABC News
Is Stephanie Clifford a “lure” to help bring unsuspecting
children into an obviously dangerous environment?Does she hook young girls with telling them
how profitable her lifestyle is?
Exactly what a “porn actress” puts in her “trophy case” can
only be imagined but one wonders who you can or even should show off such
“trophies” to.
You would think that an adulterous “porn actress” scandal
would cripple someone like Donald Trump, who rode into the White House via the
“Conservative”, Christian, Republican vote but not only does it appear not to
have affected him, a second scandal was released by the media almost identical
to the first.
President Trump’s longtime lawyer,
Michael D. Cohen, secretly recorded a conversation with Mr. Trump two months
before the presidential election in which they discussed payments to a former
Playboy model who said she had an affair with Mr. Trump, according to lawyers
and others familiar with the recording.
The F.B.I. seized the recording
this year during a raid on Mr. Cohen’s office. The Justice Department is investigating Mr.
Cohen’s involvement in paying women to tamp down embarrassing news stories
about Mr. Trump ahead of the 2016 election. Prosecutors want to know whether that violated
federal campaign finance laws, and any conversation with Mr. Trump about those
payments would be of keen interest to them. ~ The
New York Times
A single source—The Telegraph—says “Playboy Playmate of the Year”
Karen McDougal “became
religious” but curiously leaves out exactly what her “religion” is.
She maintains a website with her name “.com” (which one would assume
would be hard to obtain) but it has no content other than a photograph of her—a
somewhat decently-dressed one, fortunately.At one point there was an “About Me” page but it has since been taken down.What is Karen hiding about her background?
Once taking the plunge for porn, it was all smooth sailing
for McDougal...or, rather, “driving”.
McDougal’s first modelling assignment
was being a promotional model at a Harley-Davidson bike show in Detroit.[8]
Playboy
In 1997, McDougal tried out and won
her local Venus Swimwear swimsuit competition in Michigan, earning her place at
the international final in Florida.Her victory
caught the eye of Playboy photographer David Mecey.[4]Soon after that she was approached by Playboy
for a test shoot at Playboy Studio West which she accepted.[6]Upon completing her test shoot, she was promptly
selected to return for a complete photo and video shoot and chosen as Miss December
1997.[4]Her pictorial, which
was shot by photographers Richard Fegley and Stephen Wayda, has a winter theme[1]
and its outdoor portion was shot in the snowy fields near Park City, Utah.[9]Her video, the “Playmate Profile”, was featured
on Playboy TV soon after her magazine debut.[2]
In May 1998, she was announced to have
been chosen by Hugh Hefner and fans as Playmate of the Year (PMOY) of 1998 at a
luncheon at the Playboy Mansion.[10]
As part of being named PMOY, she was
awarded $100,000 and a special edition silver Shelby Series 1 convertible with a
customized Michigan license plate “PMOY 98”.[3]McDougal’s PMOY pictorial was featured in the
July 1998 issue of Playboy where she also appeared on its cover.[11]In contrast to her Playmate pictorial, her PMOY
pictorial has a tropical theme and its outdoor portion was shot at Saint Lucia.[3]According to her interview in her Playmate of
the Year “Video Centerfold” which was released soon after her PMOY issue debuted,
she believes her physical imperfections are her “funny” smile, her crooked pinkies
which she inherited from her grandfather and her “ugly feet” which she wishes others
would not look at.[5]Because
of the popularity of the VH1 television series “Pop-up Video“ at the time, one of
the segments in her PMOY video was done as a Pop-up Video parody filled with factoids
about her and Playboy.[5]During her appearance on The Magic Hour to promote her PMOY issue,
McDougal demonstrated her signature pose, straddle split on TV in front of a live
studio audience.[12]
In an online chat in 2002, McDougal
expressed interest in posing nude for Playboy again if offered.[13]
Fitness Modeling
In March 1999, McDougal became the first
woman to appear on the cover of Men’s Fitness magazine.[4]Since then she expanded her career into fitness
modeling by appearing in fitness and body building magazines such as Muscle
& Fitness (January 2000), Physical (June 2004) and Iron Man
(October 2005, January 2006, June 2007[14] and November 2009[15]).[8]She appeared in a 10-page pictorial in the January
2006 issue of Iron Man as “Hardbody” of the month,[16] and on
the cover of its October 2005 and June 2007 issues.McDougal returned as “Hardbody” of the month in
the November 2009 issue in a pictorial together with fellow Playmate Katie
Lohmann.[15]In interviews, she
stated that her transition to fitness modeling was unintentional.[15][17]
~ Wikipedia
Truly, the wages of sin are big money and a top-of-the-line
sportscar...at least until it comes time to pay the bills.6
If McDougal is just another pair of breasts being presented
to America’s children via the evening news, the next question is what we asked
about Stephanie “Stormy Daniels” Clifford: why her?Perhaps becoming “religious” was a bigger
benefit than you might think...if it’s the right “religion”.
Wikipedia claims
she is “of Cherokee, Scottish and Irish descent.”You probably aren’t seeing any “Cherokee”
(neither am I), and “McDougal” can bespeak of Scotland but “Irish” certainly
leaves a clue that the “religion” Karen found was Roman Catholicism.
It worked for another “former” porn actress, Jenna Jameson.
Jameson also “got religious”—more specifically, she got
Roman Catholic.
Interestingly, she seems to find no conflict with her past
and, although she’s a “former porn actress” she told Larry King in 2013 that
she wouldn’t return to porn because she’s too old for it, not because it was in
any way offensive.
Perhaps the fact that Jameson “found” Roman Catholicism also
explains how she had the pull to land an interview with Larry King.
We can only guess about what religion Karen McDougal became
“religious” in, but no guesses are necessary for the Trump lawyer being
trumpeted as the epicenter of Porn Scandal II: Michael
Cohen is Jewish.
Once again, we see a Hebrew in a high-profile but
low-influence position bolstering the “conspiracy theory” I maintain that
willing Jews are human shields for Romans.
It was here that I noticed Peter Reilly getting
involved.He had “hearted” a “tweet”
from Stephanie “Stormy Daniels” Clifford that I found quite obnoxious.
Once again I found myself on one end of an issue and Peter on another.
Being temperamental and ornery (shocking, I know), I
messaged a ribbing to Peter.
Being even-tempered and reserved (might I call him “cagey”?),
he side-stepped the issue and opened a dialogue.
I wanted to stay angry but, instead, I was disarmed and
intrigued.In fact, it was damn
Jesuitical of him!
I realized that I had squandered three years by not reaching
out to Peter sooner.
If nothing else, I could attempt to understand how a
Jesuit-trained Forbes CPA sees things.Hell, maybe I might be able to win him over in some way.
If anything, the three years since Peter and I first met
have seen me align perfectly with him on the subject of Kent Hovind.
I now see Hovind, not as an unsung hero, but as a reckless,
selfish and incompetent father, husband and Christian steward at best and an
agent of deception at worst.
To begin with, Kent is a “Creationist” like Ken Ham: a
Christian who seeks to put dinosaurs in the Garden of Eden.
This tactic does more harm than good and one wonders if men
like this know that.
If anything, a much more radical understanding of our
cosmology does far more to validate the Bible and, if carefully examined, gives
more real observational (“zetetic”) evidence.
Such an examination has been maligned as “flat Earth” but,
without the labels, this community asks some serious questions the “experts”
seem ill-equipped to answer.
Daring To Think The Un-Thinkable
For instance, if you make your own observations, the sun and
moon appear to be nearly exactly the same size and relatively close to your
position.
However, experts claim that moon has a radius of 1,079 miles
while the sun has a radius 432,169 miles—roughly 400x bigger.
These same experts claim that the moon is 238,900 miles away
from the Earth and that the sun is 92.96 million miles away.By “random chance”, the sun is 400x bigger
than the moon but also 400x further away giving it the “optical illusion” of being
the same size.If this weren’t the case,
eclipses would be impossible.
At best this is an astounding case for “intelligent design”
behind the creation of our “universe”.
According to NASA, the Earth is spinning at 1,000 mph
(breaking the 767mph sound barrier) at the equator. The Earth revolves around the sun at 67,000
mph. The solar system moves through the
Milky Way at 500,000 mph. The Milky Way
moves through the universe at 670,000,000 mph.
All that movement and yet the North Star is right there, day
after day, year after year, century after century.
NASA assures us that, again, our eyes are playing tricks on
us and this is another “optical illusion” created by the vast distance between
the Earth and the North Star.Just trust
them...really!
The experts tell us that the Earth is a spinning globe with a
radius of approximately 3,965 miles.Google explains that “Using the Pythagorean theorem, that calculates to
an average curvature of 7.98 inches per mile or approximately 8 inches per mile
(squared).”That means that, across 1
mile, there is an 8 inch drop to the horizon.At 2 miles, there is a 64 inch drop (51/3rds
feet).At 10 miles the drop is 662/3rds
feet and at 100 miles it’s an ominous 6662/3rds
feet.
There are many places around “the globe” where the naked eye
can see far beyond any perceived “curvature” but then the “experts” say you
can’t trust the ups and downs of terrain.
You can, however, trust that water always finds its own
level.If you pour coffee into a cup
with hills of sugar, it’s still a flat, calm surface once you pour enough.If you then travel to the Suez Canal you see
an astounding 120-mile-long surface with no detectable drop to the horizon.
Even more interesting is how flight of either the tiniest
insect or the most massive aircraft isn’t affected by the Earth’s rotation in
the slightest.If the Earth rotates from
east to west, air travel in one cardinal direction should take twice as long or
be twice as short in another.Of course,
this is difficult to observe as an airline passenger thanks to crazy and
seemingly inefficient connecting flights—but I’m sure there’s a logical reason
for them.
The experts tell us that, no, you can’t keep water on a
spinning ball or have centrifugal force negated for anything on the surface of
that ball but if the ball gets really, really big, at some magical point
unknown to “science” something called “gravity” cancels the effect of movement
and keeps everything conveniently in place.You can’t test this for yourself, you again have to trust the experts.
The experts tell us that the Earth’s atmosphere is composed
of 78% nitrogen, 21% oxygen, 0.9% argon, and 0.03% carbon dioxide along with
other trace elements and water vapor.Just outside that atmosphere is the icy-cold vacuum of space.If you were to try and duplicate that, the
vacuum would instantly rip the atmosphere away but, again, we are told to trust
to the magic of “gravity” and the knowledge of the “experts”.
For instance, Albert Einstein’s “Special Theory of
Relativity” does explain how “gravity” makes you feel “relative” to a stable,
flat plain instead of a ball spinning faster than the speed of sound...it’s
just too
complex for you to understand.
Consequently, “conspiracy theorists” have begun to question
whether the Jewish scientist was trying to deceitfully pull the collective wool
over our eyes.The fact that his close
friend was a Jesuit-trained Belgian Catholic priest named Georges LemaĂźtre has
nothing to do with it, we’re sure!
However, I must mention that LemaĂźtre is the astronomer who
rose to the occasion and provided an answer on behalf of Darwinian
evolutionists for the question, “If this all happened by random chance, how did
it start without God?”LemaĂźtre’s
response can basically be summarized as “First there was nothing, and then it
exploded”.The “scientific” phrase is
“Big Bang Theory”.
One wouldn’t expect a Jesuit-trained Catholic priest to be
so helpful to the Darwinians but in 2014 the Jesuit
Pope, himself, reaffirmed that both “evolution” and the “Big Bang” are
“real”.
Jesuits have run to the aid of floundering Darwinians more
than you know.
Critics of the champion of chimpanzee conjecture caused a
conundrum with the query “What was the adaptive ‘link’ between apes and
man?”During the awkward silence, Father
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, S.J., thought he would help things along a
bit.When no fossil could be found to
provide the evidence, he
simply fabricated one; “Piltdown Man”.
What was a Father who was known as the “father
of New Age spiritism” doing hoaxing archeological evidence?Perhaps the accusation that a top priority of
the “Society of Jesus” is to discredit the Bible doesn’t seem quite so
inflammatory.
At this point, tinfoil-hat-types are beginning to ask in the
language of Rome, “Cui bono?”“Who benefits?”If the Catholic
Church is “Christian”, why has it been so helpful to the Darwinian atheists who
manage to explain away the Creation?
Actually, Rome has been far more helpful than you’ve been
told and the motive is to attack and discredit the Bible, forcing
the Pope to be acknowledged as the premier authority on both “science” and
“spirtuality”.
Interestingly, both Kent Hovind and Ken Ham4 join
the Jesuit Pope in disregard for these criticisms of modern “science”. In fact, they go even further and vehemently
attack them. —Odd behavior for men who
claim that validating the Bible is their highest priority.
But from a “conspiracy theorist” perspective, Kent is even
more appealing to “the Machine” because of the quagmire of protesting taxation.
There can be no doubt that the complexity of the tax code is
a form of tyranny.America will never
see a flat tax nor will any governmental authority examine the Sixteenth
Amendment despite some interesting claims that it was unconstitutionally
ratified.In fact, a really sharp
pleader could even make a case against the Sixteenth Amendment based upon
Original Intent of the Constitution—the idea that the Federal government is
entitled to skim your paycheck before you receive it and what it skims, it
arbitrates from year to year.
The very fact that we need specialized Jesuit-trained CPAs
like Peter J. Reilly proves this point.Even if the tax code isn’t weaponized to target producers and common
citizens, its complexity is in-and-of-itself a bulwark that the super-rich can
hide behind by highering armies of Peter J. Reillys to help squirrel away their
wealth in legendary “offshore accounts”.
Encouraging citizens who are discontented and
disenfranchised with a weaponized tax code to “protest” it “ghetto-style” by
simply not paying it is the ultimate sucker punch.As the old saw goes, “You can’t fight City
Hall” and Kent Hovind proved that resoundingly.
Worse, Hovind failed those who depended upon him most.He refused to provide the safety nets of
health and life insurance required by law for his employees and his
premeditated tactics such as “structuring” (keeping transactions under $10,000
for the purposes of tax avoidance) netted his wife,
Jo, jail time as an accomplice.
She stayed with him through both their confinements but,
sadly, after he was released from prison, they divorced.
Kent Hovind adamantly maintains that
he is not a “tax protester”.I have some
issues with that.If you go to the flagship
website of his supporters #FreeKent
you can follow the links to Proof Number one “Letters from professionals absolve Kent Hovind from all wrong-doing”.The first letter is from Kent to one of the professionals
and starts with:
“I am writing to request your professional
opinion regarding the voluntary nature of Form 1040.”
A bit after the two minute mark Kent
says that everybody should follow the law including the government and that he has
not filed in 28 years and if there is a law that requires filing, he would like
to see it.The discussion that follows has
nothing to do with his status as a minister and his vow of poverty.A bit past the six minute mark he launches into
the explanation as to why trading services for money is not “income”.At 7:30, he gives a qualified plug to Irwin Schiff,
who may well have originated many of the arguments used by, for lack of a better
term, tax protesters.Irwin Schiff is also
in federal prison.
One disingenuous thing Peter
does do is conflate shocking aspects about the case against Hovind
as synonymous with his “defense”.12
The arguments that are brought
forth in defense of Kent Hovind are multifarious and include things like Jo
Hovind not being allowed to put on a robe when she was arrested, a prosecutor
who committed suicide when arrested as a pedophile and Judge Margaret Casey
Rodgers not allowing open Bibles in the courtroom during the trial.
* Kent Hovind’s wife was treated by
authorities with needless brutality unbecoming a citizen’s understanding of who
their “law enforcement” is composed of.
* Kent Hovind’s (assistant) prosecutor was a pedophile.
* Kent Hovind’s judge was a vehemently anti-Christian woman.11
Of course these facts have nothing to do with whether
Hovind was guilty of tax evasion.
But they absolutely add weight to the accusation of my
third book that the United States is secretly controlled by a cabal of
Christian-hating pedophiles based in Rome.
Kent regularly brings up the fact that
one of the prosecutors in his first trial was John
David Roy Atchison who hung himself in a prison cell after being arrested in
a pedophile sting.My hesitancy in listening
to even more interviews has to do with not wanting to, once again, hear about the
doll and the jar of Vaseline that Atchison had in his possession when arrested.The implication is that someone as wicked as Atchison
must have spent his time prosecuting godly people.
—but it has nothing to do with tax evasion at the
citizen level and everything to do with corruption and conspiracy at the
national and (forgive me) “global” levels.
I can think of few things more foolish than fighting a war
with the United States government in its own judiciary in an effort to deprive
the government of your money which it claims it is entitled to.
To think that you can deprive the government of your money
without an army of lawyers and/or accountants is beyond folly; it’s suicide.
To encourage those who trust you to do the same is a heinous
betrayal of that trust.
What’s more, if you have a distrust of government, wouldn’t
it follow that a corrupt court would rather frame you and/or change its rules
than see you win at their own game?
A single successful “tax protester” brings down the entire
system.With “all the marbles” at stake,
the side that owns all of the machine guns, armored trucks, helicopters, radios
and CCTV cameras wins.
If this is common sense (and it is), there are only two
explanations for why someone would willingly attempt a no-win fight like this:
1) The individual in question is
not processing this information as a healthy adult.Failure to receive and process accurate
information is no excuse.A mature adult
knows that if you don’t know how to fly a plane, you don’t volunteer to take
your family for a vacation flight with yourself at the helm.
2) The individual in question is an
agent of deception being used to lure disenfranchised citizens into committing
suicide with them.Variations on this
include a dupe who is manipulated to become even more appealing than without
help, to a fully-trained operative who is in no real danger of prosecution.
At best, I can only hope that Kent Hovind is a dysfunctional
dupe but it is noteworthy that, upon his release from prison, he not only
jumped feet-first into the “flat Earth” debate, both on the wrong side and
seemingly without proper investigation, he also has warned against
understanding prophetic passages of Scripture like Daniel 2 and 7 or Revelation
17 thru 20 as having anything to do with the Catholic Church.
When I first started to question the role and power of the
Vatican, the only “expert” to pop up that had reliable information was “Eric
Jon Phelps”.
Phelps labels himself a “White Separatist American Freeman,
Dispensational, Fifth Monarchy, Seventh-Day Baptist-Calvinist”.
Racial division is one of the most powerful “divide and
conquer” weapons that has been used both repeatedly and successfully by the
Elite.
Phelps also offers a 3-day course in how to litigate against
the United States government.For $2,000 you can
learn to turn the “ALL CAPS” of official documents against the Leviathan!
Recently, Phelps
was promoted in his local newspaper as the arch-typical “anti-Catholic
white separatist”.He dispenses
information about the Vatican that is unavailable anywhere else and then he
completely discredits himself with Jesuit Biblical eschatology, racism and a
“solution” that is patently absurd: start his own country.
It’s great press...for the Catholic Church.
Eric Phelps’s Reformation Bible
Puritan Baptist Church is Lebanon County’s only organization plotted on the
Southern Poverty Law Center’s map of hate groups, but his picturesque farmhouse
near Newmanstown doesn’t look like a headquarters of hate. ...
While he insists he isn’t hateful,
Phelps is a proud and active advocate of racial separation and anti-Catholicism
— and he has big plans for Lebanon County.His goal: a community that secedes from the United States and
Pennsylvania, is devoid of Hispanics, African-Americans and Catholics,
institutes the death penalty for “doing dope,” and forbids homosexuality and
adultery.
“These Hispanics and these blacks
that commit crime everywhere — they have reduced Lebanon to nothing but a
savage war zone, for the most part.That’s all done by the Pope — he brought them in here,” Phelps
said.“If I can’t have (racial
separation) in Lebanon, I’ll move to another county where we can do it, but we
have to go to a white county that’s historically Protestant.”
Phelps isn’t idle while waiting for
the consummation of that dream.He
pastors his church, which meets in his home to study the Bible and eat
fellowship meals of “white Protestant cuisine,” like meat and potatoes.Attendees include his family and a few
others, but his personal invitation is required to join.
He also broadcasts an Internet
radio program with followers around the world and hosts “private citizenship”
classes in Myerstown that have been attended by as many as 25 paying customers,
he said, preaching an anti-Catholic gospel message wherever he goes.
My son, heretofore you have been
taught to act the dissembler: among Roman Catholics to be a Roman Catholic, and
to be a spy even among your own brethren; to believe no man, to trust no man.Among the Reformers, to be a reformer; among
the Huguenots, to be a Huguenot; among the Calvinists, to be a Calvinist; among
other Protestants, generally to be a Protestant, and obtaining their confidence,
to seek even to preach from their pulpits, and to denounce with all the
vehemence in your nature our Holy Religion and the Pope; and even to descend so
low as to become a Jew among Jews, that you might be enabled to gather together
all information for the benefit of your Order as a faithful soldier of the
Pope.
You have been taught to insidiously
plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between communities, provinces, states
that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of blood, involving them in war
with each other, and to create revolutions and civil wars in countries that
were independent and prosperous, cultivating the arts and the sciences and
enjoying the blessings of peace.To take
sides with the combatants and to act secretly with your brother Jesuit, who
might be engaged on the other side, but openly opposed to that with which you
might be connected, only that the Church might be the gainer in the end, in the
conditions fixed in the treaties for peace and that the end justifies the
means.
You have been taught your duty as a
spy, to gather all statistics, facts and information in your power from every
source; to ingratiate yourself into the confidence of the family circle of
Protestants and heretics of every class and character, as well as that of the
merchant, the banker, the lawyer, among the schools and universities, in
parliaments and legislatures, and the judiciaries and councils of state, and to
be all things to all men, for the Pope’s sake, whose servants we are unto
death.
Adding to the evidence of this tactic, I have chronicled
several moments in history that seem to fit my premise with sinking perfection:
the repeated betrayal of oppressed Patriots in Communist tyrannies by the CIA—an
organization founded and run
by Roman Catholics.
Again and again, the Central
Intelligence Agency has enabled the radical Left and Communism to maintain
stasis and stability as an important factor in the Hegelian Dialectic of
thesis, antithesis, synthesis (more colloquially known as “problem, reaction,
solution”).Communists and Communist
nations were always behind the West in technology, capability and prosperity.As a result, Roman-controlled bankers,
billionaires and intelligence bureaus repeatedly betrayed their Western nations
of birth to keep the Communists afloat — sometimes with vicious results.
Bohemian Grove regular Dwight Eisenhower462
repeatedly promised in his 1952 campaign to “liberate” the Eastern European
nations that were given to Joseph Stalin (reputed to be a Freemason, guaranteed
to have been influenced by Freemasonry463 and was a Roman Catholic
with Jewish heritage trained to be a Jesuit priest464) by Scottish
Rite and Shriner Freemason Franklin Roosevelt465 along with
Freemason Sir Winston Leonard Spencer-Churchill (Studholme Lodge 1591466).The game was rigged from the beginning.
Eisenhower was the perfect puppet.He somehow managed to avoid a single
leadership billet throughout his entire military career (never a Platoon
Leader, Company Commander, Battalion Commander, Brigade or Division Commander)
until becoming Supreme Allied Commander, Mediterranean Expeditionary Force467
just prior to becoming Supreme Allied Commander, Europe.Armchair warriors make the best yes-men.
The modus operandi of
Jesuit-controlled Freemasonic Western leadership was to set up the real Communist-fighting
Patriots and then pull the rug out from underneath them.
Chinese revolutionary Chiang
Kai-shek had the power and popular support to guarantee barring Communists
entry into China so General “Vinegar Joe” Stillwell, General George C. Marshal
and President Franklin Roosevelt made sure he failed and was overthrown
(particularly in prohibiting necessary supplies like small arms468)
guaranteeing the advent of Mao Zedong; a true monster who murdered so many of
his own people that the counts are unsure even today but they start at
60,000,000.469
The Hungarian Revolution of 1956
was another example of treason and betrayal by Rome’s intelligence puppets.Traitors in the West had been pleading with
Hungarian Patriots to revolt —
It is a well-known fact that
Radio Free Europe and the Voice of America in the 1950s encouraged resistance
to — if not an outright revolt against — Communist oppression.In a 1998 interview with CNN, Hungarian
Ambassador to the U.S. Geza Jeszensky, who was 15 years old at the time of the
revolution, remarked: “I kept listening to Radio Europe like 10 million
Hungarians did.Radio Free Europe
certainly encouraged the Hungarians to resist the Soviets.But it was not Radio Free Europe which
instigated the Hungarian Revolution.Perhaps
the Hungarians were misled, not by the radio, but by the propaganda language by
the U.S. administration.It spoke about
liberation and rollback.Eisenhower kept
speaking about liberation, but as a historian put it, it proved to be only a
myth.Liberation was not meant
seriously.”2Radio Free
Europe also had an impact on [Soviet] Premier [Nikolai
Alexandrovich] Bulganin and his Politburo.3~ Thomas J. Torda,
Ph.D., The American-Hungarian Federation470
Once Hungarian Patriots were
convinced to commit themselves, Western traitors stepped back and Soviet
brutality stepped in.[italics
suspended]
The defeat of the Hungarian
revolution was one of the darkest moments of the Cold War.At certain points since its outbreak on
October 23 the revolt looked like it was on the verge of an amazing triumph.The entire nation appeared to have taken up
arms against the regime.Rebels, often
armed with nothing more than kitchen implements and gasoline, were disabling
Soviet tanks and achieving other — sometimes small but meaningful — victories
throughout the country.On October 31,
the tide seemed to turn overwhelmingly in the revolution’s favor when Pravda
published a declaration promising greater equality in relations between the
USSR and its East European satellites.One
sentence was of particular interest.It
read: “[T]he Soviet Government is prepared to enter into the appropriate
negotiations with the government of the Hungarian People’s Republic and other
members of the Warsaw Treaty on the question of the presence of Soviet troops
on the territory of Hungary.”
...Washington’s role in the
Hungarian revolution soon became mired in controversy.One of the most successful weapons in the
East-West battle for the hearts and minds of Eastern Europe was the
CIA-administered Radio Free Europe.But
in the wake of the uprising, RFE’s broadcasts into Hungary sometimes took on a
much more aggressive tone, encouraging the rebels to believe that Western
support was imminent, and even giving tactical advice on how to fight the
Soviets.The hopes that were raised,
then dashed, by these broadcasts cast an even darker shadow over the Hungarian
tragedy that leaves many Hungarians embittered to this day.
Once the Soviets made up their
minds to eliminate the revolution, it took only a few days to complete the main
military phase of the operation.By
November 7 — coincidentally, the anniversary of the Bolshevik revolution —
Soviet forces were firmly enough in control of the country that KĂĄdĂĄr could
take the oath of office in the Parliament building (even though the Nagy
government had never formally resigned). ~ Malcolm Byrne, NSA Archive471
To make absolutely sure Soviet
armor had as much time as was needed to slaughter as many Hungarian Patriots as
possible, Eisenhower had his Ambassador to the United Nations, Adlai Ewing
Stevenson II, delay any possible U.N. intervention.472
The exact same scenario replayed
itself 12 years later in Czechoslovakia.After goading Czech Patriots into action for the 1968 “Prague Spring”,
all of Western Intelligence not only went silent, it went dark.
... 27 divisions of Soviet
Russians, Poles, Hungarians and Bulgarians — around 300,000 men, armed with
2,000 heavy cannons — marched into the small state of Czechoslovakia to end the
experiment of “socialism with a human face.” It was the largest military
operation since the World War II...
For months, the eyes of the
world had been on Prague, where a group of officials around Communist Party
chief Alexander Dubcek had challenged the Soviets with new civil rights for
Czechoslovakia, new press freedoms and plans for privatization.Leonid Brezhnev, General Secretary of the
USSR’s Communist Party, ordered a number of threatening military maneuvers in
and around Czechoslovakia starting in May.
But when the maneuvers grew
serious, the American, British and German governments seemed to look the other
way, judging by documents from the NATO archive in Brussels as well as
intelligence files seen by SPIEGEL.“Not
a single evaluation” managed to predict the Soviet invasion of Prague, according
to the NATO Military Committee, the alliance’s highest military authority.~ Der Spiegel473
Western media pushed the laughable
idea that — despite Western leaders being given daily (probably hourly) briefs
on Czechoslovakia — a WWII-sized Soviet invasion force was simply “lost” to the
combined efforts of Allied intelligence operations.
Seven years earlier, in 1961, a
similar treason was conducted on the Patriots of Cuba.These Cuban exiles, however, had direct
interaction with the CIA in their training, organization, equipping and
transportation.
They received everything except
what they needed most; a flight of 6 A-26 Invaders as air support.National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy
(Skull and Bones 1940) personally saw to this betrayal as has been noted by Air
Force Colonel and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chief of Special Operations for
President Kennedy, Leroy Fletcher Prouty.474
Bundy would go on to blame John F. Kennedy
for sabotaging the Bay of Pigs leading up to his assassination by the
Jesuit-run CIA475 as well as see to it that CIA fingerprints were
covered up.476 ~ Secret
History, Johnny Cirucci, CreateSpace (November 24th, 2016),
pp. 524-529
What’s my solution?—It certainly isn’t to fight the government at its own game.
There is deep wisdom in the way Jesus dealt with the issue—but
keep in mind that it was presented to Him as a trap with no right answer.
Then the Pharisees went and plotted
how they might entangle Him in His talk. And they sent to Him their disciples with the
Herodians, saying, “Teacher, we know that You are true, and teach the way of
God in truth; nor do You care about anyone, for You do not regard the person of
men. Tell us, therefore, what do You
think? Is it lawful to pay taxes to
Caesar, or not?”
But Jesus perceived their
wickedness, and said, “Why do you test Me, you hypocrites?Show Me the tax money.”
So they brought Him a denarius.
And He said to them, “Whose image
and inscription is this?”
They said to Him, “Caesar’s.”
And He said to them, “Render
therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that
are God’s.”
When they had heard these words,
they marveled, and left Him and went their way. ~ Matthew 22:15-22, New King
James Version
It’s not a stretch to interpret Jesus’ words to mean, “The
game is rigged so stop trying to beat the dealer.”
The Roman Empire of Christ’s time ruled overtly by tyranny
and military occupation but the Roman Empire of our time can only rule by
hiding itself behind the illusion that we’re still in control.
If that curtain of deception is ripped away, one can easily
see those who were fooled into serving the Fateful City, turning upon her.
Then he said to me, “The waters
which you saw, where the harlot sits, are peoples, multitudes, nations, and
tongues. And the ten horns which you saw
on the Beast, these will hate the Harlot, make her desolate and naked, eat her
flesh and burn her with fire.For God
has put it into their hearts to fulfill His Purpose, to be of one mind, and to
give their kingdom to the Beast, until the Words of God are fulfilled.And the woman whom you saw is that great city
which reigns over the kings of the Earth.” ~ Revelation 17:15-18
1.Although this might
seem to be a Left-wing agenda, it would’ve been a healthy move towards stemming
the “Global War on Terror”.Holding
“terrorists” offshore provides the United States military and the Central
Intelligence Agency with loopholes regarding humane treatment of victims.It’s no coincidence that the facility is in
the nation of America’s vehement Communist “enemy”, Cuba.Fidel Castro learned tyranny and Communism
through three separate Jesuit institutions while growing up; Colegio Lasalle
and the Colegio Dolores, in Santiago and the Colegio Belen, a
Jesuit preparatory school in Havana.The
mistreatment of prisoners guarantees that, if they ever leave Guantanamo, if
they weren’t “terrorists” coming in, they were going out.Obama’s CIA Director, Jesuit-trained
Roman Catholic John Brennan did the same.His indiscriminate
drone attacks, in blatant disregard for any nation’s sovereign airspace,
guaranteed more, rather than fewer, enemies of the United States.The agenda may even be more sinister than
that.During the September 11th
2012 attack on the CIA waystation in Benghazi, Libya, a former Guantanamo
detainee was there and may even have lead the raid.The CIA has been accused of doling
out weapons to jihadis out of Benghazi and it has been rumored that Ambassador
Chris Stevens arrived because someone at the State Department had qualms about
including surface-to-air missiles in the plan.Not only was Stevens captured, tortured and murdered (insuring that his
mission was not accomplished), his escape to a “safe room” was thwarted by terrorists
who had inside information.Was that
information given to the likes of Sufian bin Qumu during his “visit” to
Guantanamo Bay?
2.Jesuit admirers say this nickname
derives from the humble black priest’s cassock the Superior General always
wears while detractors say it stems from the dark, evil, all-encompassing power
wielded by Loyola’s successor.They may
even make the accusation that the Clinton Administration attack on Waco (where
80 men, women and children were burned alive, Inquisition style) and the
blowing up of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal building in Oklahoma city
“commemorate” Loyola’s Generalship.All
three happened on April 19th.For more terrible events on or about April 19th, read my book
Illuminati
Unmasked!
3.Perhaps there is something, after
all, to the rumored “Fourth Vow of Extreme Unction” as it acknowledges“You
have been taught to insidiously plant the seeds of jealousy and hatred between
communities, provinces, states that were at peace, and incite them to deeds of
blood, involving them in war with each other, and to create revolutions and
civil wars in countries that were independent and prosperous, cultivating the
arts and the sciences and enjoying the blessings of peace.To take sides with the combatants and to act
secretly with your brother Jesuit, who might be engaged on the other side, but
openly opposed to that with which you might be connected, only that the Church
might be the gainer in the end, in the conditions fixed in the treaties for
peace and that the end justifies the means.” 4.By a “quirk” of serendipity, both
men share the initials “K.H.”—or is
there something more at work here...?
5.A “porn actress” with a man’s middle
name?This implies parental misconduct
of a perverse nature.Unfortunately,
when children grow up to be involved in perversion, the roots usually run
through the parents.
6.As I’m fond of quoting from the
Luciferian movie produced by Disney and Marvel, Dr. Strange, “The bill
comes due.”For the wages of sin is
death, but the Gift of God is Eternal Life in Christ Jesus our Lord. ~
Romans 6:23
7.Hey, it sounds good when you’re
breathing the rarefied air of a billionaire with his super-model
Catholic wife—although, I guess not “super-model” enough.
8.“Farnese” is one of the names that should
be coming up when you research who really rules the world behind the scenes; as
well as Medici, Orsini, Aldobrandini, Colonna, Borgia and Breakspeare.Instead, “Rothschild” and “Rockefeller” are
delivered to you, courtesy of the search engine whose birthday is the same as
the Company of Loyola.However, there
have never been any Rothschild Bishops, Cardinals or Popes whereas those other
names have been staples in Roman clergy.
9.That’s just a conjecture to open your
mind to the plausibility of the “scandal” being contrived. Unfortunately, it’s just as plausible that a
billionaire pervert bought himself nookie with a porn star.I’m sure it was more distasteful than her
usual “co-stars” but also a lot quicker.
10.Even here the Leftists at “the
Nation” spin this important story in the wrong direction: the issue isn’t how
much “people’s candidate” frauds like Trump and Hillary “cost the
government”.The issue is that the rules
are always different for the Elite.The
bloated, parasitic government syphons your life blood but those who rule over
you are insulated from the bloodletting.
11.If you’ve heard my show, I frequently
mock the far-Left culture of women in authority positions they often show
evidence of not being qualified for, inserting their maiden name without a
hyphen to confuse those around them.
12.To his credit, this is unlike the
galante CPA and, perhaps we’ll just write it off to being “unclear”.So-called “Hovindicators” have offered up
these facts as conflated with Hovind’s defense and Peter simply parroted them
rather than be clear.He may have little
reason to but it’s all a smoking gun for me!
