Showing posts with label flat earth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label flat earth. Show all posts

Saturday, July 28, 2018

Hovindologist Down The Flat Earth Rabbit Hole

Lamar Smith is back from an assignment.  I asked him to look into the odd interaction of Kent Hovind and flat earth.  The way this connects with tax is kind of intriguing.  The people who are commonly called tax protesters, a term they dislike, have a pretty preposterous belief. It is that most people who pay federal income tax are being deceived into paying a tax that really does not apply to them.  The grandfather of the movement and possibly the inventor of many of the arguments is Irwin Schiff.

The movement lives on with, among others, Joe Bannister - Agent of Truth.  What is preposterous, besides the arguments themselves, is that they always lose in court except for the occasional criminal acquittal using the Cheek defense,  In order for them to be right, there would have to be a conspiracy involving the entire federal judiciary among others.

What I finally realized is that conspiracies of that scope and much larger are part of the world view of Kent Hovind, who while claiming not to be a tax protester, played one in court and prison and the continual promotion of his innocence narrative.

And Young Earth Creationism, the notion that real science supports a hyper-literal reading of Genesis that allows you to arrive at the age of the universe by summing up begats and tacking on six days requires an even grander conspiracy.  The biology, geology and astronomy departments in every university have to be in on it - just for starters.

There is a continuum that comes with using the Bible as a science textbook.  Form YEC, you move to geocentrism.  And the next step is flat earth (Usually a disc sort of shape).  I'll spare you the scriptural argument, other than to note that it is pretty compelling.  The people who wrote the texts that eventually became the Bible probably mostly believed that they lived on a firmament supported by pillars to the extent that they thought about the issue at all.

The scale of the conspiracy to deceive us into believing in a roughly spherical earth revolving around the sun if that is not true is mind boggling. It's not just the professors,  There has to be a lot of technology like GPS and even pre electronic aviation and maritime navigation that works differently than we think it works.So the moon landing was a fake.  Maybe.  But GPS really works because of ground stations not satellites and nobody is talking about that?

Regardless, it turns out that geocentrism and flat earth are bridges too far for Kent Hovind,  And that has the flat earth Christians very upset because he is such a solid guy on evolution and creation that it is so disappointing that he does not take the next obvious step into a biblical world view.

To end this perhaps too long introduction, that is what I asked Lamar to look into and here is his report. - PJR

IF YOU’VE GOT A PERFECTLY GOOD RAZOR THAT DOESN’T CUT, MAYBE YOU’RE USING IT WRONG

I have returned from down the rabbit hole. Now, if I tell you that up is still up and North is still North, I’ve done you no favors because, since I’ve now told you this, you can rest assured it’s a lie because the rules of the game state rather clearly that everyone is always lying when they say something. The only real truth you can count on are YouTube videos.....

Unless you can’t.......

Who can know?

Peter Reilly gave me an assignment to look into and it has taken its toll on my time and sanity but Kent Hovind is now more embroiled in the FE debate than ever.......

Unless he isn’t.......

I’ll get to who I hope is Lenox’s most controversial resident shortly but my research has entangled me even more in the Flat Earth movement and I’ll get to Kent through them.  

First, though, two simple observations; Kent has dropped the word ‘literal’ from his description of what “the crew at Dinosaur Adventure Land” believes about the Bible and the calls for a Presidential Pardon are conspicuously absent for several weeks from his videos.

I’ve spent my time with the Flat Earthers and it’s been utterly confusing and exposed me to statements where I understood every single word in a sentence or question but have no idea what they collectively meant.  Please read a very abbreviated list of my transcriptions of direct quotes from Flat Earth debates and discussions that utterly confuse me but do not ask me for an explanation of their meaning. I remain as confused by these pronouncements and questions as you, most probably, will be:

“Even your eyes are lying to you, why can’t you see that?”

“Which direction of South are you talking about heading, right now?”

“NASA’s budget is a quarter of a billion dollars. Do you know how much of that is being spent on proving the shape of the earth is round? None! You can go look that up!”

“Sunlight isn’t daylight, most people don’t know that.”

“Well, how flat is a pancake, anyway?”

“The inner hemisphere of stars turns counter-clockwise and the outer hemisphere of stars turns clockwise.”

“I don’t have any idea what video or photo you’re talking about but I already have a video on my channel debunking it.”

“You have to understand that ‘Pac Man’ has two meanings and you have to be clear which one you mean.”

“No, you don’t understand, there’s a barrier above us. It’s invisible and can’t be detected in any way but we know it’s there.”

“People back then could just add to or take away from their calendars a few hundred years, if they wanted to. How would anyone know?”

“They have removed huge sections of the ocean and that’s why we can’t find the downed Malaysia flight.”  

“Oh yeah, I looked at that NASA footage. Do you know how easily I could have faked that? You give me a couple of thousand dollars and I could bring you an image just like that in a week. If an image looks easy for me to fake, it’s fake.”

“Occam’s Razor says ‘Do not unnecessarily multiply assumptions,’ therefore the only logical conclusion is that a conspiracy to control all of us has been underway for half a millennia involving every branch of every government of every country and almost every major company for the last 500 plus years. Nothing else makes sense!”

These are the sort of things that have assaulted my brain for weeks. To say that I’ve discovered some issues with the Flat Earth movement is the equivalent of saying the sky is blue but even that has been questioned. The label ‘Flat Earth,’ though is increasingly problematic, though a replacement isn’t immediately obvious.

The sub-sets of positions that currently fall under the ‘Flat Earth’ umbrella are truly manifold and, it seems to me, are truly testing the carrying capacity of a single term to describe them.

I think the best way to represent this is by posing questions that different members of the movement would answer in different ways:

1) What is the basic shape of the Earth? 

Kent Hovind has had conversations and done videos with Dr. Robert Sungenis that have gotten Kent off the sidelines and offered debate challenges to FEers. Both of these men agree that the earth is round but Dr. Sungenis holds that the earth is round but fixed and the entire universe revolves around it. Dr. Sungenis is Catholic and has many YT debates against Protestants of different stripes. He claims expertise in many ancient languages and claims that FE assertions from the Bible are unfounded or, at best, are very selective translations. 

Kent’s alliance with Dr. Sungenis is, on the face of it, somewhat strange, given their discrepant views on so many scientific and theological points outside of the shape of the earth and at least one FEer has attempted to drive a wedge between them. More on that shortly.

2) What is above the atmosphere of the Earth?

Listen to enough FE debates and discussions and you’ll hear some really far out theories about what’s far and out. Some hold there is an actual barrier, a canopy, a ‘semi-sphere’ above us. Weather balloons don’t pop at the end of their life-span, they deflate when they hit this barrier. Planets and stars are just projections on this, some hold. This barrier is why every rocket launch, every satellite is fake, except when they fail and, on those, ‘they’ knew they’d fail.

3) What is the proper and provable relationship between the sun, the earth and the moon?

Oh, man. If you have the guts to ask this question to a single flat-earther, bring a chair and get a snack and an adult beverage..... or six....  Throw this out to a group or panel or convention of them, buckle up and watch the show! Just the sun question will consume hours and hours. FEers claim to love Occam’s Razor and then consistently propose ad hoc solution after ad hoc solution in direct contravention of it. They can’t quite get away from direct observations anyone can make. When it’s daytime where you are, unfortunately for FEers, it seems it’s night somewhere else. The sun, then, must be small, close, have a shade like a lamp and the shade must, somehow, change shape throughout the day and year.

Even after they get the sun sorted out (they never really do) the audience may be astounded by the claims about the moon. Some hold that while the sun emits “hot light,” the moon, according to some, also is the source of light, but it’s “cold light.” Some FEers have done ‘scientific’ research with store-bought laser thermometers and ‘discovered’ that on the night of a full moon, temperatures of objects in direct moonlight are lower than objects in the shade of the moon. Their methodologies are questionable at best.

As far as the moon goes, though, virtually all FEers are in agreement that no person has ever actually been there, though a very few will concede it might be possible to go. Former stuntman, limousine driver and current gubernatorial candidate for California ‘Mad’ Mike Hughes, a very prominent figure in the FE movement, has already launched himself in a homemade steam-powered rocket, a few thousand feet in the air to gain attention for his cause of building and launching a bigger homemade rocket high enough to actually see the curvature of the earth. AronRa asked Mad Mike on a panel on a Non-Sequitur podcast, “So, if you’re able to launch yourself as high as you intend, won’t you have proven that if the US had put all its technical expertise to the task of going to the moon, that it, in fact, did? I mean, aren’t you proving yourself that it could have been done?”

After a long pause, Mad Mike gave one of the most honest and telling answers I’ve ever heard from a Flat Earther: “No, I can never believe that that happened or is possible no matter what evidence I have.”

Aron tried to press him: “But, Mike, you will have proven it’s possible.”

Mad Mike pivoted to his gubernatorial platform of disbanding all standing military forces and returning to a militia-based system and spoke no more of the moon landings.

There are many other questions that don’t have simple binary responses that divide the FE movement. There is no map of the Earth that all support, they just know the globe Earth is wrong.

I shared a link in an earlier post that is the most commonly accepted FE map. It posits a disc shape with Antarctica ringing the outside. Observations that this arrangement means that Antarctica couldn’t experience 6 months of daylight and 6 months of dark,” are currently met with “I’m ok w/the Arctic getting 6 months of sun and 6 months of dark but that doesn’t happen in Antarctica. I don’t see that from where I am.” The name of this particular projection is the Azimuthal Equatorial, or AE, map.

The closer you get to the North Pole the more accurate this map is but distances in the Southern Hemisphere are badly distorted. Australia appears to be something like 2 1/2 times as wide as the US. Some FEers have proposed cutting slices out of the Southern Hemisphere to fix this and this debuts the first of two references to Pac Man. Cut a slice out and you’ve got that lovable video game icon from the ‘80s. Please don’t ask me “What’s happening in Pac Man’s ‘mouth,’ I don’t know.

The other problem with the AE map is it puts Antarctica on the outside and makes its coast line on the order of 75-80k miles long. It’s actually only around 12k. 

Another map and another Pac Man appearance follows the diamond projection. Supporters of this projection point out that the dimensions of the diamond match the angles present in the Great Pyramid if you put a mirror image of itself directly under itself. Why that’s important remains beyond me. The problems with this image are that oceans are at the edges of each diamond edge. “What happens when a boat or airplane gets to the edge?”

Well, those of us of a certain age actually played Pac Man and remember that in fleeing from Inky, Blinky, Pinky & Clyde (Why do I remember that?), you could steer Pac Man into a couple of tunnels on one side of the board and then immediately appear on the opposite side of the board. I know I never wondered “Hey, how did that happen anyway?” Advocates of the diamond don’t know either but they’re claiming it actually does, not in Pac Man’s world, but right here on earth.  Any solution, for Flat Earthers, is better than admitting we’re on a globe.

Beyond the question of what they believe, many Flat Earthers really think the question of why they believe what they believe is important and  this, actually, divides the FE camp. Most of the FEers I’ve heard admit to being Creationists but only after long conversation and prompting. The diamond-earthers have to at least believe in the supernatural or their Pac Man’s tunnel to the other side doesn’t work at all. 

A Flat Earther named Rob Skiba states directly and immediately that he holds to the Flat Earth model because he understands a literal reading of the Bible to teach that fact. Skiba was and is at the point of attack when Kent Hovind decided to get involved. Skiba considers himself a ‘student’ of Kent Hovind though it’s not clear this is literally true. Skiba’s videos are full of praise for Hovind’s ‘knowledge’ of evolution and even mild chiding that “Kent, you’ve showed us there are ‘Lies in the Textbooks,’ I’m simply challenging you to realize that they’re not just in the Biology textbooks. They’re also in the Geography textbooks, as well. You say you believe the Bible literally......”




I spoke directly to Kent by phone after he released his Sungenis video and issued his 4-part challenge to the FE community. I tried to warn him off trying to debate Rob Skiba or others like him who hold to the Flat Earth for theological reasons. I foresee that a debate between Kent and a theologically-minded FE won’t be a debate about the shape of Earth but just a debate over Biblical interpretation that no one would actually win but Kent would come off appearing to be less Biblically literal than his opponent and that wouldn’t benefit him.

My world has become so bizarre that I was trying to help Kent Hovind not lose credibility or face with his own followers. Whether the world is flat or round, it certainly seems upside down to me right now.

So, Kent Hovind’s set to debate, right? He’s done  well over 100 with opponents supporting evolution.  No foreseeable problems, then?

Well........

Both Hovind and Skiba have burned much time and many electrons first saying “I really don’t want to debate this!” Skiba claims this because he says he’s too busy, he’s said everything he needs to say on the matter, he respects Hovind too much and he has a bit of a precondition. Skiba has proposed that Hovind and Sungenis debate first on the issues that divide them and he’ll “take the winner.” Both have spent so much time posturing before a debate has happened that they could have held numerous actual debates in the time they’ve spent.

Sungenis has already agreed to this proposal by contacting Skiba directly.

Hovind has yet, as of this writing, to respond.

In the videos flowing back and forth between Hovind & Skiba, anyone can watch snippets and reasonably conclude that Skiba doesn’t want to do it and Hovind doesn’t want to do it. You can watch other snippets from the exact same videos where Skiba sent emails months ago that he was eager to debate and Hovind is ducking him. Hovind, too, of course, claims to be both the reluctant quarry and the bold challenger all at the same time. Both end up asking the camera pointed at them “I’m not sure how you could possibly have mistaken my intentions,” when an objective observer could watch their videos and still come away wondering “So, do they want to do this or not?”

I’m not sure if I’ve fulfilled Peter Reilly’s original assignment or not. I’ve entered a world where compasses are probably in on the conspiracy, words don’t mean what they’ve ever meant before, to really know is to have no idea and to try to head south could mean any direction at all, all at once or none at all.

Peter, please find enclosed a bill for all the therapy I’m going to need to recover from this.

Here is an incomplete list of my sources but they cover most of my claims. I highly recommend no one spend the time to view them that I did. Take a walk, visit an old friend, knock yourself in the head with a ball peen hammer, all are better uses of your time:







I need a shower and a shave rather desperately. Has anyone seen my Razor?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter J Reilly is a CPA who has become a writer of sorts.
Lamar Smith has taught high school history and is now a regular contribution to Your Tax Matters Partner,










Wednesday, June 13, 2018

What Motivates Flat Earth Believers

Lamar Smith is back with more on flat earth.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I wanted to follow up on my earlier thoughts on the Flat Earth movement and, just to prove to Peter Reilly that I could  not mention Kent Hovind even once.........DANGIT! Ok, no more after this.

I’m fascinated by the individuals, the movement and the thought processes behind social phenomenon such as the Flat Earth.

I haven’t been able to gather more than anecdotal evidence but I suspect a fairly sizable crossover between Flat Earthers (FEs) and 9/11 “Truthers.” Whether this is broadly true or simply for those to whom this  does apply, it seems likely that it is a “logical” extension. Given the length of time and the dwindling media coverage of and interest in the 9/11 conspiracy peddling, maybe one explanation for the flat earth is that it’s simply the conspiracy theory du jour. 

I’ve heard FE debaters give their bios along these lines: “Well, I was into 9/11 and just kept looking and now I’m into this.” So, “logical,” right?

There is a great deal of research on what makes otherwise functioning members of our society latch on to conspiracy theories of all sorts.

Evolutionary psychologists refer to the “tiger in the weeds” phenomenon. Our ancestors on the savannah noted a rustle in the weeds. Individuals that attributed it to the wind or thought nothing of it at all might continue happily munching on some carcass and find they lost the opportunity to become our ancestor, pass on their genes and avoid the beast that began happily munching on them.

Those that lived long enough to become our ancestors were those that saw agency in the rustle and scampered up the nearest tree even when it was just the wind. Paranoia has a survival advantage but also creates a species prone to what scientists refer to as false positives and confirmation bias. In one sense, seeing agency (read conspiracy) even when it isn’t really present is hard-wired into humans.

Psychologists refer to another glitch in the human mind that demands a bad answer rather than no answer at all. One of the most difficult parts of training to be a scientist is the requirement to be comfortable with not knowing. Scientists live on the frontier between what is known and unknown. The budding scientist who sees a hole in our knowledge and simply inserts something without the proper foundation is excoriated by her peers. 

The scientist who posits “I don’t know what this is.......  It MUST be......” and it doesn’t matter how brilliant the next word or words that follow are. That scientist’s peers will eviscerate his work in peer-reviewed journals. If you don’t know what it is, the conversation is over until you do. If a researcher doesn’t know something they are required to say as much.

Not so in the world of conspiracy theories. It almost seems in that world that you win points for coming up with the most outlandish untested and, often, untestable theory. Lump multiples of those together and you double your bonus. It’s the opposite and antithesis of Occam’s razor. Rather than minimize assumptions, Conspiracy Theorists revel in multiplying them.

Much of modern science has simply passed the layman by, myself included.  I’ve heard scientists themselves say “the easy problems have all been solved.” The cutting edge mysteries being worked on now require multiple nations, millions of dollars and at least a 30 minute conversation just to describe what’s being studied in the most rudimentary way. We’re way past the time when an amateur with zeal, working alone in his basement in his free time can push the boundary between the scientific knowns and unknowns. 

Some of those that long for those days and are working to recapture them are conspiracy theorists. These zeal-filled folk can’t discover the Higgs boson but they have the internet and don’t have to have a particle accelerator or leave their basement to “contribute” to the flat earth movement. They do this, in other words, because this is what they can do.

We’ve all heard “knowledge is power,” and psychologists have studied the power dynamic of conspiracy theorists. Doing this, whatever their ‘this’ is, gives conspiracy theorists a feeling of power and control in a world where few of us experience a surfeit of either given the pace of change in our modern world. We’ve all felt that rush when we knew something before everyone else in our office or family or local bar knew it. Same with knowing something no one in our circle will ever know if we don’t tell them.

Whether what the conspiracy theorist knows is factually correct is completely beside the point.

On specifically the Flat Earth movement I approached this question the same way I did following 9/11. Forget the minutiae, that’s where FEs live and breathe and you’ll never get those minutes of your life back that you waste on it. 

Look at the big picture of what is really being proposed. Their map, when they give you one (it’s more difficult than you think to get one from them) fails. No matter how they lay it out, there will be two points that their map says are far apart that just aren’t. They usually propose something like one of the maps shown here


So, ice in the middle, an ice ring around the perimeter and a tiny sun, really close to the earth that doesn’t provide heat in any logical way.  Frequently gravity is denied.

To conclude, though, let’s remember that this is a Conspiracy Theory. Set aside the question “Why would so many people and groups even bother?” because there isn’t a good answer that I’ve heard. Let’s focus on the Conspiracy. It makes 9/11 look timid by comparison. Who is in on it? 

An incomplete list:
1) Every major nation, certainly every nation with a space or satellite program. You know, the Government.  Governments. Even the ones that hate each other.
2) NASA of course. All lying. Every astronaut is an actor and we never went to the moon.
3) Google and their satanic Google Maps.
4) Every international airline which takes the trouble to fly inefficient and expensive routes to maintain the fiction.
5) Every major shipping company
6) Every astronomer and observatory
7) Every scientist from a relevant field for the last 300 years.

No single entry to this list could maintain a Conspiracy, much less all of them. Our President can’t keep a meeting of 8 White House officials about leaking secret. 7 of the people in that meeting leaked and that’s just a meeting about trying to stop leaks.

That list is nowhere near exhaustive but the simplest evidence for a globe earth I know came from my time in the US Army (also in on it). I did basic training at Ft. Benning in Georgia and had the privilege of visiting the Army Shooting Team’s barracks. 

This is a clip from ‘Suicide Squad,’ one of the many super hero movies in vogue just now. Will Smith plays Floyd ‘Deadshot’ Lawton, an assassin for hire who gets imprisoned and then coopted to join a super hero group of villains deemed expendable. He agrees to this to shorten his sentence so he can try to reunite with his daughter. Spoiler alert, they succeed in their mission and he’s granted some time to visit his daughter. Pay close attention to what he says to her about long distance shooting:




Long before Flat Earth became a thing a fantastic marksman in the Army confirmed that fact to me. Seems rather obvious, no? Shoot long enough and you have to factor in the curve of the earth and snipers are not in the business of missing to maintain a conspiracy.

Believing in this, thinking about, writing about it and even having conventions about the Flat Earth may fill some of these people’s lives with meaning, no matter how misguided. What FE’s future may be can’t be known but we’ll all keep our eyes on the horizon, even if it is fake, for the next Conspiracy Theory to come along.

See, Peter, I did a whole post without mentioning Hovind.........DANGIT!!!

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lamar Smith taught high school history in Texas for twelve years.  He is a regular contributor to YTMP.



Wednesday, June 6, 2018

It's A Flat World After All



We defend the position that the Bible is literally true and scientifically accurate in every detail. - Kent Hovind
Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. - Jehova (Job 38:4)
There is a pretty widespread view that whatever value the Hebrew and Christian scriptures might have, they are not a lot of use for scientific fields such as biology, geology and astronomy.  On the other hand, there are folks like Kent Hovind who insist that everything in their selection and translation (King James in Hovind's case) is "scientifically accurate in every detail".  

Hovind focuses on debunking the "lie of evolution" and argues for a universe that is about 6,000 years old (That's what you get from summing up all those begats and tacking on seven days).  On the other hand Hovind is OK with establishment science when it comes to the shape of the earth and the layout of the solar system up to a point (I don't know enough astronomy to pinpoint where it stops working for him).  Thus Hovind believes that the earth is shaped roughly like a globe and orbits the sun.

Because of that view he finds himself listed among heretics by those who find strong scriptural support for the notion that the earth is a flat disk. 



I've asked Lamar Smith to weigh in on the drama. 




(Go to 7:00 for beginning of flat earth discussion)


Peter Reilly has given me an assignment! In the spirit of transparency, though, I know exactly how B’rer Rabbit felt as he was tossed into the briar patch. I’m headed exactly where I want to go and where I would have gone myself, sooner or later.

There is a ‘movement’ across the globe by a small but rather vocal group that posits that the globe is not, in fact, a globe.  It’s colloquially known as the Flat Earth movement.

Now, Kent Hovind has actually spoken at some length about this collection of folks which might, at first blush, seem a little strange because every time he does so he can’t help but interject “I really don’t want to talk about this.” Then he does so on multiple occasions and for considerable lengths of time.

The movement itself is a loosely knit collection of people from internet trolls to NBA star Kyrie Irving to rapper B.O.B that espouses the belief that the earth is closer to the shape of a flat disc than a sphere. 

A moment’s consideration of all the things that would mean, if true, boggles the mind. Begin to dig into the incredibly long list of potential problems with this theory and you’ll be stunned at the cognitive dissonance on display. Every solution I will mention isn’t held by every member of the movement and confronting one flat-earther with what you know or have found often elicits the response “Oh, that’s just what THOSE flat-earthers think! My brand of flat earth, though, thinks something else about that issue.”

Common to most, though, is a general dislike and distrust of scientists and their findings. The flat-earthers, like young earther Kent Hovind, claim to “like science but distrust scientists” for no other reason than those pesky scientists disagree that the earth is either less than 10,000 years old, as Hovind believes, or flat.

Common to both groups, they’ve arrived at their conclusion then get on with the business of rejecting or twisting or cherry-picking all data to support their pet conclusion.  

I’m comfortable claiming that virtually every young earther is religious and holds their view for predominantly religious reasons.  I’m slightly less comfortable making the same claim for flat earthers. Proponents of the flat earth, it seems to me, have taken a lesson from the young earthers and don’t often talk about their religious views unless pressed. They tend to stick to data and apparent “inconsistencies,” knowing that if they cite the Bible, skeptics will dismiss them out of hand.

When they do cite scripture, the following are common:

1 Chronicles 16:30: "He has fixed the earth firm, immovable."
Psalm 93:1: "Thou hast fixed the earth immovable and firm ..."
Psalm 96:10: "He has fixed the earth firm, immovable ..."
Psalm 104:5: "Thou didst fix the earth on its foundation so that it never can be shaken."
Isaiah 45:18: "...who made the earth and fashioned it, and himself fixed it fast..."
Again, not all flat-earthers agree but a significant sub-set believe that not only is the earth flat but it is immovable and the center of the universe.

If you find yourself saying “That’s what predominantly land-based people believed in the Ancient World through the Middle Ages!” Yeah, it is. Sea-faring people not so much. They’ve always had more direct access to evidence that counters the flat earth unless, of course, you listen to flat earthers today. It turns out, according to most flat-earthers, tall ships do not disappear hull first as they sail away from you. If your eyes have to lie to you to support their theory, they seem shockingly at peace with that.

There’s no way I can list all of the arguments I’ve heard (they’re really bad) or the rational counter-arguments. I want to discuss the intersection of flat earthers and young earthers especially in the person of Kent Hovind.

It is not safe to assume all flat earthers are also young earthers, but Kent indicates he thinks this is true and it’s certainly more true than not. If you hear a flat earther quote scripture then you can be practically assured both views are at least supported in that person’s mind by a hyper-literal interpretation of the Bible.

Of particular note is the video linked above of Kent’s summation and attempted refutation of the flat earth model. He claims the movement began in 2012 and was “probably by atheists.” In other videos he’s claimed the devil himself started the movement, though he never offers any evidence supporting either claim. The purpose of the movement, according to Kent, is to either divide Christians, make Christians look ridiculous or both. 

In this video he also shows a PPT slide saying “Flat Earth is a Jew Hoax” with a truly offensive caricature straight from the worst pages of Nazi propaganda. Even his disclaimer of “Now, I don’t know if the flat earth is a Jew hoax or not,” could be taken to imply that Kent believes that “Jew hoaxes” do exist and the flat earth theory just might be one of them.

I’ve pointed out how much I adore irony and what a target rich environment Hovind world is for irony. It is no secret that Kent is prone to see conspiracies even where none exists. His objections to evolution mean that the fact that evolution is the cornerstone of all biological sciences amounts to a massive conspiracy. Flat earthers, too, are squarely in the same camp. The promotion of the globe earth, to them, is the culmination of a centuries long conspiracy against what they see as the truth.

Some of Kent’s more ironic offerings coming from a young earther to the flat earthers:  “You can get people to believe almost anything. It is bizarre what some people believe.” He finds the belief in a flat earth utterly bizarre but an earth about 6,000 years old makes perfect sense.

“Do you know how much time Jesus spent on the flat earth? Zero! None!” observes Kent. Of course the question “How much time did Jesus devote to evolution?” never comes up. It’s the exact same amount, by the way.

In most of Kent’s introductions he’ll proclaim “....we’re the folks who believe the Bible is literally true.....” then he went on in this video to discuss how parts of the Bible should definitely be taken metaphorically. He criticizes the flat earthers for taking certain passages literally and not metaphorically then happily continues on doing the exact same thing with his favorite passages supporting a young earth.

Some of his objections in this video seem rather paltry to me. He jumps on the word ‘flat’ by pointing out that the earth has mountains and valleys and shows passages in the Bible describing the same therefore the earth isn’t ‘flat.’ I don’t see the value in quoting the Bible that mountains exist. One might come away with the impression that unless the Bible said there were mountains, Kent Hovind might not believe there were.

According to the Isaiah quote about the earth being a circle, Kent points out rather ridiculously that if the earth has depth it’s a cylinder. The flat earth argument is about the basic shape of the earth and Kent chose to give a geometry lesson. This is not the first time Kent sweats what something is called instead of what something is or how it behaves or what it’s nature is.

So, what is it about this movement that’s got the fearless Kent Hovind a might gun-shy? He believes they’re Christians, by and large, so I’m sure that plays into him not wanting to bash them too hard.  The flat earthers who do use scripture to support their beliefs seem to be staking out an even more extreme, more literal interpretation of the Bible and I’ve always felt that Kent prides himself on his already extreme views. His ideas relegate him to a fringe and it’s always seemed that that suits Kent just fine until, perhaps, folks more extreme than he is come along.

To see a fringe conspiracy theorist like Kent Hovind in a feud with even fringier conspiracy theorists is amongst the most entertaining spectacles I can imagine. I hope that the next time Peter Reilly gives me an assignment this enjoyable he sends along some popcorn. It was the only thing lacking to make this entertainment complete.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lamar Smith who has taught history in high school in Texas for twelve years is a regular contributor to Your Tax Matters Partner.


Sunday, January 3, 2016

Raw Story Uses Video Editing To Defame Kent Hovind

Fond as I am of the guy, I can't fault people for being critical of Kent Hovind. David Edwards of Raw Story has gone over the line though in his recent post on Hovind.

I declared an end to L'Affaire Kent Hovind as a tax story back in August when his co-defendant Paul Hansen received a below-guidelines sentence.  I did mention Kent on forbes.com in my annual round-up of high traffic posts. Standards on Your Tax Matters Partner are a little looser than forbes.com, though, so I have something about Kent that I want to share that is really not tax related.

There was a post on Raw Story - Creationism evangelist: God put contradictions in the Bible to 'weed out' the atheists. Apparently David Edwards has been watching Kent Hovind's thriving youtube channel where he mainly answers bible questions.  The first sentence of the story is:

Young Earth creationism evangelist Kent Hovind asserted this week that God had purposefully put contradictions in the Bible to “weed out” non-believers.
They include a clip.  That runs 1:21.  I didn't notice it the first time I saw it, because I am old and slow-witted but forewarned is forearmed.  Watch closely at around 0:35.

At any rate, the reason I knew to look for that break was that I went back and watched the whole video from Kent's channel (Well the first fifteen minutes anyway)



The section that Raw Story excerpted from starts around 4:56 and runs to around 8:00 for a total of over 3 minutes of which Raw Story included less than half.  The part that Raw Story left out was Kent explaining why he did not think the particular passages from Acts under discussion were contradictions.  Kent's riff, included by Raw Story was about what purpose apparent contradictions might serve.  There is a bit of Hovind grandiosity there as he indicates that the heavenly father is doing things much as Kent would if he were the big guy, but Kent Hovind is not saying that there are contradictions in the bible,

You might want to stay for the next two sections.  There is a question from someone who wants to tithe to Kent's ministry and Kent's soft sell approach to donations is very refreshing.

 Next comes a flat earth question.  The flat earther attacks on Kent Hovind are really interesting.  I discussed them some here. What I find really intriguing is that Hovind responds entirely with scientific arguments that the earth is not flat..  He mentions that there are scriptures twisted to support flat earth, but he does not get into that.  He also theorizes that atheists started the flat earth stuff, which is classic Hovind conspiracy thinking.

Peter J Reilly is a tax blogger who has been following the Kent Hovind story for over three years.  He is one of the few people who have managed to piss off both Hovind supporters and Hovind detractors with his coverage.  It's a gift.