Tax stuff I think is interesting. It is either copied from my primary blog on forbes.com http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/ or stuff that I did not put there because being on forbes is a good gig and they have, you know, standards. Also some guest posts.
Tuesday, August 12, 2014
Shulman to Congress: Repeal DOMA You Dummies
Originally Published on forbes.com on September 19th,2011
I have often commented on the various reasons why I am ill qualified to work for the IRS. One of the main ones is that I am over 37 and a half which disqualifies me from the really cool jobs where you can go about armed. Now I see why I should not be the Commissioner. You see Congress makes messy complicated laws which they have trouble changing because they are in gridlock. They then blame the IRS which is stuck with enforcing the laws as Congress has written them. So they just wrote a letter to the Commissioner about what a mess is created by having people who are married or registered domestic partners in community property states not having their relationships recognized under federal law :
Dear Commissioner Shulman:
We write today to bring to your attention the serious issues that registered domestic partners and same-sex married couples experienced in the 2010 tax filing season. These couples face significant complexity in filing even the most simple of returns, often resulting in improper enforcement action by the Internal Revenue Service at a considerable cost to these taxpayers and the federal government. We urge the IRS to take swift action to address these issues and ease the unequal burdens faced by these taxpayers.
Currently, fifteen states recognize same-sex marriage or domestic partnerships with no equivalent recognition under federal law. The absence of federal recognition for these couples has created ambiguity and complexity in the tax law that can, in part, be mitigated through IRS action. In the 2010 Annual Report to Congress, the National Taxpayer Advocate discusses the inequities faced by these couples, and recommends the IRS publish rulings and guidance to address these issues. We ask that the IRS review these recommendations and take appropriate action to ensure that the tax law is enforced with integrity and fairness to all taxpayers.
Furthermore, domestic partners living in Washington, California, and Nevada, face additional tax complexity with respect to community property. For couples living in these three states, community income and community deductions are shared equally between both partners, as required by the IRS and well established Supreme Court precedent. However, current IRS systems do not adequately link domestic partners — resulting in erroneous notices of improper reporting and the inaccurate assessment of penalties and interest. These errors are costly for the taxpayer to address, and waste significant IRS funds and resources.
Now, more than ever, our tax system must be simplified for taxpayers and provide for the efficient and economical administration of our tax laws. While we believe that legislative action should be taken to fully address the inequities experienced by same-sex couples, we urge the IRS to take immediate action within its authority to reduce unnecessary burdens ad ensure our tax law is applied fairly and equitably to all taxpayers.
Thank you for your thoughtful consideration and committee to these issues.
I drafted a response for the Commissioner to send to Congress which is the title of this post. Probably not the best way to handle the matter. Good thing I’m not the Commissioner.