Tax stuff I think is interesting. It is either copied from my primary blog on forbes.com http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/ or stuff that I did not put there because being on forbes is a good gig and they have, you know, standards. Also some guest posts.
Monday, July 21, 2014
E-books Exempt from New York Sales Tax
Originally Published on forbes.com on August 2nd,2011
It’s in Boston right near the Famine memorial. I’m afraid E-books may have had something to do with it. I liked this particular Borders, but I love my Kindle. I don’t think this decision by New York will make people love their Kindles any more but it can’t hurt. It’s not that long so I’ll give you the full text:
New York Advisory Opinion TSB-A-11(20)S , 07/08/2011
Date Issued: 07/08/2011
ADVISORY OPINION PETITION NO. S101118A
The Department of Taxation and Finance received a Petition for Advisory Opinion from . Petitioner asks whether its sales of e-books are subject to sales and use tax. We conclude that they are not.
Petitioner, a California company, stores a digitized catalog of electronic books (“e-books”) available for sale to customers inside and outside New York through its on-line bookstore. E-books purchased through Petitioner’s electronic bookstore are delivered electronically via the Internet to customers and are stored on the customer’s personal electronic devices, including tablets and smart-phones. Customers are then able to view and read the e-books on certain electronic devices. The e-books purchased through Petitioner’s electronic bookstore are not generally available for printing and are not transferable for viewing on a computer.
The catalog of e-books available for download will primarily consist of copyrighted content, licensed for distribution to Petitioner, but not owned by Petitioner. Moreover, the informational content of an e-book sold through Petitioner’s bookstore will not materially differ from the tangible version of the same publication. Formatting and layout of text in the e-book may be different, but the informational content of an e-book will not differ in any substantive respect from that of a tangible, printed copy of the same book. Petitioner’s e-books, like their printed counterparts, may be updated (for instance, to correct typographical errors) in subsequent printings, but are otherwise static. Also like their printed counterparts, Petitioner’s e-books may be re-published in future editions or printings, but the purchase of updated copies is generally a separate transaction unrelated to prior purchases of earlier editions. To pay for the e-books, Petitioner’s customers may use acredit card serviced by a third party financial institution, or other methods.
Petitioner represents that its e-books meet the definition of an e-book for purposes of the policy that the Department of Taxation and Finance recently announced (Department’s Policy Regarding Whether E-Books Constitute Information Services Subject to Sales and Use Taxes, TSB-M-11S).
The Tax Law imposes sales and use tax on tangible personal property, including prewritten software, and certain enumerated services, including information services (Tax Law § 1105[a], [c]).
Petitioner’s e-books are not tangible and do not include any prewritten computer software. Accordingly, they do not constitute tangible personal property. As to whether the e-books constitute taxable information services, TSB-M-11(5)S provides that the Tax Department’s current position is that electronic publications that meet the memorandum’s definition of an e-book do not constitute information services. The TSB-M sets forth the following definition of an e-book:
the purchase of the product does not entitle the customer to additional goods and services and any revisions done to the e-book are for the limited purpose of correcting errors;
the product is provided as a single download;
the product is advertised or marketed as an e-book or a similar term;
if the intended or customary use of the product requires that the product be updated or that a new or revised edition of the product be issued from time to time (e.g., an almanac), the updates or the new or revised editions are not issued more frequently than annually; and
the product is not designed to work with software other than the software necessary to make the e-book legible on a reading device (e.g., Kindle, Nook, iPad, iPhone or personal computer).
Petitioner represents that all of its e-books meet the above definition. Based on that representation, Petitioner’s e-books are not taxable as information services under the Department’s current policy.
I’m not going to miss Borders all that much but losing Barnes and Noble would be a real blow. The ones that are scattered across the country are great places to hang out with the kids for an hour or two or by myself. If I’m with the kids I usually don’t get out for less than fifty dollars. Then of course there is what I consider the real Barnes and Noble on Fifth Avenue and I think it’s 18th street (Who has time for looking at street signs when approaching a shrine ?) It is a mandatory stop whenever I take my daughter to Manhattan. My high school is on 16th street between Fifth and Sixth Avenue. I spent a lot of time in that bookstore with its maze-like layout which must astound the bookstore managers from the provinces when they come to visit. That’s where I bought the Lord of the Rings Trilogy. If e-books end up totally ruling that place must be preserved for its historic significance.