tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post3562714638489679884..comments2024-03-29T03:27:43.567-04:00Comments on Your Tax Matters Partner: Little Drama Outside As Jury Selection In Kent Hovind Trial Proceeds Smoothly On Day OnePeter Reillyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01473701483727808782noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-18139981699524514292015-03-05T17:09:13.630-05:002015-03-05T17:09:13.630-05:00I murdered my babies? You paid me to murder my bab...I murdered my babies? You paid me to murder my babies? Do you have the canceled check?<br /><br />Wait. I had babies?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-40439107124153636672015-03-04T03:49:22.089-05:002015-03-04T03:49:22.089-05:00#FreeKent and www.FreeKentHovind.com Taxs are a RI...#FreeKent and www.FreeKentHovind.com Taxs are a RIP OFF! why should I have to pay for you to murder your babies?! Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-2203779509432129852015-03-03T19:21:27.762-05:002015-03-03T19:21:27.762-05:00Kent and his people, despite my repeated efforts, ...Kent and his people, despite my repeated efforts, have trouble admitting to some of what Kent Hovind was found guilty of in the 2006 trial; and it's an matter near and dear to the heart of Kent Hovind and his people.<br /><br />You would think that after 8 more years they would have at least figured out what it was. I think they have, but Kent and his people, most of them, don't want to admit to it and deal with it. Instead, Kent and his people keep being noticed misrepresenting the law and its application to Kent.<br /><br />My invitation for that discussion remains outstanding and is, I believe, fundamental to understanding Kent's criminal history and sovereign citizen, tax cheatin' antics.<br /><br />Robert Baty’s Structuring Proposal for Discussion<br /><br />Withdrawing less than $10,000 in a single transaction<br />with the intent to evade bank reporting requirements<br />is a violation of the law and regulations and was at<br />the time of the Hovind withdrawals in question and<br />was the legal standard used to convict Kent Hovind<br />of “structuring”.<br /><br />Robert Baty - Affirm<br />Kent Hovind - DenyRLBatyhttps://www.facebook.com/pages/Kent-Hovind-and-Jo-Hovind-v-USA-IRS/339508739517135noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-32158073232830389312015-03-03T15:54:44.431-05:002015-03-03T15:54:44.431-05:00Dear Peter,
I too don't want to be overly cri...Dear Peter,<br /><br />I too don't want to be overly critical, but the balance must be based on facts.<br /><br />You don't need to "pack every aspect into every article." That is not the issue.<br /><br />An article about Hovind and his trial should be restructured if there are ten lines about Snipes, Schiff and Sharpton, but not a single line about what Hovind was found guilty for in 2006 and what he was charged with in 2014.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-91438651872366712032015-03-03T15:39:33.315-05:002015-03-03T15:39:33.315-05:00Typical anonymous Hovindicator whiner who wants to...Typical anonymous Hovindicator whiner who wants to talk about anything except Kent Hovind criminal career.RLBatyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14685581652348535601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-69048858483930959682015-03-03T14:41:53.055-05:002015-03-03T14:41:53.055-05:00Not to sound too critical -- thanks to Sheffler fo...Not to sound too critical -- thanks to Sheffler for covering it and to Peter for hosting it here. It's a good article and Sheffler goes into some detail. But still, the deliberate distortion of fact and the endless diversionary tactics by Hovind's supporters are something people who have not dealt with creationists before may not be prepared for.<br /><br />Anyway, I think one interesting takeaway spin from this story is that a Tea Party director says that Eric Hovind's Creation Today and Ken Ham's Answers in Genesis corporations are not serving Christ.Rick Hartzognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-71026915232101425662015-03-03T11:54:08.547-05:002015-03-03T11:54:08.547-05:00You really should come up with something a little ...You really should come up with something a little more clever after all this time.Peter Reillyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01473701483727808782noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-32806856797888521322015-03-03T11:37:39.413-05:002015-03-03T11:37:39.413-05:00peter reilly allies himself with an ex irs employe...peter reilly allies himself with an ex irs employee who admits he lies about kent hovind on purpose.<br /><br />peter's duck standard goes like this, "if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's a duck"<br /><br />so according to peter's own standard, he is a ducking liar.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-82267841398839186732015-03-03T11:36:07.987-05:002015-03-03T11:36:07.987-05:00you would know robert, you like protecting your ir...you would know robert, you like protecting your irs buddies who admit to stealing a quarter billion from americans, abuse their structuring laws, get awards for targeting christians (lois lerner $149k)... now they apologize...<br /><br />but they are not terrorists they are just the irs (how are your retirement checks coming along?)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-10266977930742879032015-03-03T11:34:02.647-05:002015-03-03T11:34:02.647-05:00www.FreeKentHovind.com & http://freekenthovin...www.FreeKentHovind.com & http://freekenthovind.com/2015/03/02/32-live-updates-usa-vs-kent-hovind/ for LIVE updates #FreeKent <br />prison is the back door to gun control and tyranny and profit for judges, and lawyers, it is all a sham.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-57926617896078926452015-03-03T11:07:08.884-05:002015-03-03T11:07:08.884-05:00I have been covering this story for over two years...I have been covering this story for over two years and can't pack every aspect into every article. Here is a discussion from forbes on Hovind's innocence claims and there are other discussion on this site<br /><br />http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2015/01/13/looking-at-kent-hovinds-innocence-claims/<br /><br /><br /><br />Peter Reillyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01473701483727808782noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-11239480855690895802015-03-03T10:43:16.620-05:002015-03-03T10:43:16.620-05:00I tend to agree with Anonymous. The point also ne...I tend to agree with Anonymous. The point also needs to be made that all these others who owe back taxes are not denying their debt or defying the government's authority to levy it, or filing complaints of corruption against the judge, or lawsuits against individual agents/wardens/prosecutors/what-have-you. Hovind is just as unrepentant now as he was when he went in eight years ago and is still promoting his fantasies to his followers.<br />Rick Hartzognoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-46666117618676922432015-03-03T10:08:16.480-05:002015-03-03T10:08:16.480-05:00It was probably just someone from DHS keeping tabs...It was probably just someone from DHS keeping tabs on suspected, or potential domestic terrorists.RLBatyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14685581652348535601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-74123092493785969562015-03-03T10:07:26.721-05:002015-03-03T10:07:26.721-05:00Please do a better job reporting on the facts and ...Please do a better job reporting on the facts and don't get sucked into a red herring by idiots who don't know the difference in quantity and the type of charges between Hovind and these other cases.<br /><br />Hovind was not convicted over failing to file income taxes like Wesley Snipes or Al Sharpton who wasn't charged criminally for anything. In 2006, Hovind was guilty of "willful" failure to withhold employee tax, structuring and obstructing the government. <br /><br />Hovind faced more than 250 years in prison on those FIFTY-EIGHT felony charges and received 10 years.<br /><br />In contrast, Wesley Snipes was convicted of THREE misdemeanor charges of not paying income tax.<br /><br />Someone who was convicted of THREE charges should receive less time than another person convicted of FIFTY-EIGHT. Right?<br /><br />To recap: Hovind's supporters bring up other people who received different prison terms for less crimes because they don't know the circumstances that Hovind was tried and found guilty.<br /><br /><br />If you, as a reporter, are going to give a voice to fringe people that mention other figures who received less time than Hovind then you have a duty to to your audience the differences in the amount and type of charges between the cases.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-55281561590611037542015-03-03T09:26:04.840-05:002015-03-03T09:26:04.840-05:00Who is this demonic documentarian? That's wha...Who is this demonic documentarian? That's what I want to know!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17742542300752116878noreply@blogger.com