tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post1780713174777467799..comments2024-03-26T03:15:27.706-04:00Comments on Your Tax Matters Partner: Raw Story Uses Video Editing To Defame Kent HovindPeter Reillyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01473701483727808782noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-48777093926353660312016-01-03T16:07:55.458-05:002016-01-03T16:07:55.458-05:00You are right. I fixed. Thanks.You are right. I fixed. Thanks.Peter Reillyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01473701483727808782noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-88802887024047448662016-01-03T16:04:28.918-05:002016-01-03T16:04:28.918-05:00Peter, you wrote, in part:
- "The part that ...Peter, you wrote, in part:<br /><br />- "The part that Raw Story left out was Kent <br />- explaining why he did not think the particular <br />- passages from Acts under discussion were not <br />- contradictions."<br /><br />I think there is one too many "nots" in that statement.RLBatyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14685581652348535601noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4421006301341157258.post-12688620972430837292016-01-03T12:51:38.046-05:002016-01-03T12:51:38.046-05:00I noticed that the Raw Story got a lot of traction...I noticed that the Raw Story got a lot of traction around the Internet/FaceBook, but I did not pay much attention to it; not a subject I was particularly interested in.<br /><br />I'll have to consider taking a closer look I guess.<br /><br />I have "shared" this article around and we'll have to wait and see how it goes over.<br /><br />I suspect Raw Story and the article's author will be responding; making Peter all the more famous (which I get to take a little credit for since I put him on to the Hovind story to begin with)!RLBatyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14685581652348535601noreply@blogger.com